ZGM03 ZGM03 vs Zowie EC2-CW
The short answer
ZGM03 ZGM03 wins this comparison with a score of 44/100, ahead of Zowie EC2-CW (37).
The main differences: 2.4GHz wireless (— vs ✓).
Scores are computed from 10 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| ZGM03 ZGM03 | Zowie EC2-CW | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 63 | 26 |
| Design | 33 | 15 |
| Connect | 32 | 63 |
| Battery | 4 | 4 |
| Value | 71 | 71 |
How to choose
Pick the Zowie EC2-CW if you care about…
- 2.4GHz wireless ✓ vs —
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Razer Viper V3 Pro
Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2
Glorious Model I 2
Pulsar X2V2 Mini
Logitech MX Master 3S
Glacier LW 8K L Mouse
Where they differ
1 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| ZGM03 ZGM03 | Zowie EC2-CW | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.4GHz wireless | — | ✓ | Zowie EC2-CW |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Performance3▾
| ZGM03 ZGM03 | Zowie EC2-CW | |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | — | 3200 DPI |
| Sensor | — | 3370 |
| Weight | — | 77 g |
Design2▾
| ZGM03 ZGM03 | Zowie EC2-CW | |
|---|---|---|
| Buttons | — | 5 |
| RGB lighting | — | — |
Connect3▾
| ZGM03 ZGM03 | Zowie EC2-CW | |
|---|---|---|
| Wired | — | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | — | — |
| 2.4GHz wireless | — | ✓ |
Battery1▾
| ZGM03 ZGM03 | Zowie EC2-CW | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | — | 70 h |
Value1▾
| ZGM03 ZGM03 | Zowie EC2-CW | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | — | 110 USD |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, ZGM03 ZGM03 or Zowie EC2-CW?
ZGM03 ZGM03 has the higher overall score (44 vs 37). Choose Zowie EC2-CW instead if 2.4GHz wireless matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: 2.4GHz wireless (— vs ✓).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 10 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.