ZTE Blade V80 Max vs ZTE Blade V80 Pro
ZTE Blade V80 Pro — Pick the ZTE Blade V80 Pro — it leads these groups: Display 2 Performance 1 Camera 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
ZTE Blade V80 Pro wins this comparison with a score of 40/100, ahead of ZTE Blade V80 Max (34).
The main differences: Screen size (6.9 in vs 6.8 in) · Peak brightness (780 nits vs 1000 nits) · Pixel density (260 ppi vs 317 ppi).
Scores are computed from 24 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the ZTE Blade V80 Max if you care about…
- Screen size 6.9 in +0.2 in vs 6.8 in
- Battery capacity 6000 mAh +1000 mAh vs 5000 mAh
- Weight 191 g +4 g vs 195 g
- Width 77.8 mm +1.2 mm vs 79 mm
Pick the ZTE Blade V80 Pro if you care about…
- Peak brightness 1000 nits +220 nits vs 780 nits
- Pixel density 317 ppi +57 ppi vs 260 ppi
- Storage 256 GB +128 GB vs 128 GB
- Main camera 108 MP +58 MP vs 50 MP
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Where they differ
12 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| ZTE Blade V80 Max | ZTE Blade V80 Pro | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 in | 6.8 in | ZTE Blade V80 Max |
| Peak brightness | 780 nits | 1000 nits | ZTE Blade V80 Pro |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 317 ppi | ZTE Blade V80 Pro |
| Battery capacity | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh | ZTE Blade V80 Max |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7250 | Unisoc T7280 | Depends |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB | ZTE Blade V80 Pro |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | ZTE Blade V80 Pro |
| Weight | 191 g | 195 g | ZTE Blade V80 Max |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.7 mm | ZTE Blade V80 Pro |
| Length | 171.6 mm | 166 mm | ZTE Blade V80 Pro |
| Width | 77.8 mm | 79 mm | ZTE Blade V80 Max |
| Colors | Stardust Purple, Stellar Silver, Aurellia Gold, Sky Cyan, Space Black | White | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| ZTE Blade V80 Max | ZTE Blade V80 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 in | 6.8 in |
| Peak brightness | 780 nits | 1000 nits |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 317 ppi |
| Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Battery3▾
| ZTE Blade V80 Max | ZTE Blade V80 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 22.5 W | 22.5 W |
| Wireless charging | — | — |
Performance4▾
| ZTE Blade V80 Max | ZTE Blade V80 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7250 | Unisoc T7280 |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
Camera2▾
| ZTE Blade V80 Max | ZTE Blade V80 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
Design6▾
| ZTE Blade V80 Max | ZTE Blade V80 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 191 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | — | — |
| Length | 171.6 mm | 166 mm |
| Width | 77.8 mm | 79 mm |
| Colors | Stardust Purple, Stellar Silver, Aurellia Gold, Sky Cyan, Space Black | White |
Memory1▾
| ZTE Blade V80 Max | ZTE Blade V80 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | ✓ | ✓ |
Platform1▾
| ZTE Blade V80 Max | ZTE Blade V80 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Features2▾
| ZTE Blade V80 Max | ZTE Blade V80 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, ZTE Blade V80 Max or ZTE Blade V80 Pro?
ZTE Blade V80 Pro has the higher overall score (40 vs 34) and leads in Display, Performance, Camera. Choose ZTE Blade V80 Max instead if Screen size matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (6.9 in vs 6.8 in) · Peak brightness (780 nits vs 1000 nits) · Pixel density (260 ppi vs 317 ppi).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 24 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.