ZTE nubia Flip3 vs ZTE nubia Focus 2
ZTE nubia Focus 2 — Pick the ZTE nubia Focus 2 — it leads these groups: Performance 2 Design 2 Memory 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
ZTE nubia Focus 2 wins this comparison with a score of 44/100, ahead of ZTE nubia Flip3 (31).
The main differences: Screen size (6.9 in vs 6.7 in) · Pixel density (439 ppi vs 262 ppi) · Display type (Foldable OLED vs IPS LCD).
Scores are computed from 24 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the ZTE nubia Flip3 if you care about…
- Screen size 6.9 in +0.2 in vs 6.7 in
- Pixel density 439 ppi +177 ppi vs 262 ppi
- Wired charging 33 W +10.5 W vs 22.5 W
- Selfie camera 32 MP +16 MP vs 16 MP
Pick the ZTE nubia Focus 2 if you care about…
- Battery capacity 5000 mAh +390 mAh vs 4610 mAh
- RAM 8 GB +2 GB vs 6 GB
- Storage 256 GB +128 GB vs 128 GB
- Main camera 108 MP +58 MP vs 50 MP
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
OnePlus 13
OnePlus 15
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Where they differ
15 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| ZTE nubia Flip3 | ZTE nubia Focus 2 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 in | 6.7 in | ZTE nubia Flip3 |
| Pixel density | 439 ppi | 262 ppi | ZTE nubia Flip3 |
| Display type | Foldable OLED | IPS LCD | Depends |
| Battery capacity | 4610 mAh | 5000 mAh | ZTE nubia Focus 2 |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 22.5 W | ZTE nubia Flip3 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB | ZTE nubia Focus 2 |
| Chipset | Dimensity 7400X | Unisoc T760 | Depends |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB | ZTE nubia Focus 2 |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | ZTE nubia Focus 2 |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | ZTE nubia Flip3 |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8 mm | ZTE nubia Flip3 |
| Length | 170 mm | 163.6 mm | ZTE nubia Focus 2 |
| Width | 76 mm | 74.9 mm | ZTE nubia Focus 2 |
| Colors | Black, White | Aurora White, Cerulean Blue, Obsidian Black | Depends |
| Memory card slot | — | ✓ | ZTE nubia Focus 2 |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| ZTE nubia Flip3 | ZTE nubia Focus 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 in | 6.7 in |
| Peak brightness | — | 1000 nits |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Pixel density | 439 ppi | 262 ppi |
| Display type | Foldable OLED | IPS LCD |
Battery3▾
| ZTE nubia Flip3 | ZTE nubia Focus 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 4610 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 22.5 W |
| Wireless charging | — | — |
Performance4▾
| ZTE nubia Flip3 | ZTE nubia Focus 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Chipset | Dimensity 7400X | Unisoc T760 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
Camera2▾
| ZTE nubia Flip3 | ZTE nubia Focus 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
Design6▾
| ZTE nubia Flip3 | ZTE nubia Focus 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 187 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | — | — |
| Length | 170 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Colors | Black, White | Aurora White, Cerulean Blue, Obsidian Black |
Memory1▾
| ZTE nubia Flip3 | ZTE nubia Focus 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | — | ✓ |
Platform1▾
| ZTE nubia Flip3 | ZTE nubia Focus 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Features2▾
| ZTE nubia Flip3 | ZTE nubia Focus 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, ZTE nubia Flip3 or ZTE nubia Focus 2?
ZTE nubia Focus 2 has the higher overall score (44 vs 31) and leads in Performance, Design, Memory. Choose ZTE nubia Flip3 instead if Screen size matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (6.9 in vs 6.7 in) · Pixel density (439 ppi vs 262 ppi) · Display type (Foldable OLED vs IPS LCD).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 24 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.