ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT vs ZTE nubia Neo 5
ZTE nubia Neo 5 — Pick the ZTE nubia Neo 5 — it leads these groups: Memory 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
ZTE nubia Neo 5 wins this comparison with a score of 38/100, ahead of ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT (33).
The main differences: Peak brightness (1300 nits vs 1000 nits) · Pixel density (386 ppi vs 314 ppi) · Display type (AMOLED vs IPS LCD).
Scores are computed from 24 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT if you care about…
- Peak brightness 1300 nits +300 nits vs 1000 nits
- Pixel density 386 ppi +72 ppi vs 314 ppi
- Wired charging 80 W +35 W vs 45 W
- RAM 12 GB +4 GB vs 8 GB
Pick the ZTE nubia Neo 5 if you care about…
- Battery capacity 6050 mAh +50 mAh vs 6000 mAh
- Memory card slot ✓ vs —
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Where they differ
13 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT | ZTE nubia Neo 5 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peak brightness | 1300 nits | 1000 nits | ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT |
| Pixel density | 386 ppi | 314 ppi | ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT |
| Display type | AMOLED | IPS LCD | Depends |
| Battery capacity | 6000 mAh | 6050 mAh | ZTE nubia Neo 5 |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 45 W | ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB | ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT |
| Chipset | Unisoc T9100 | Unisoc T9300 | Depends |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | Depends |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.5 mm | ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT |
| Length | 163.3 mm | 166.1 mm | ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 78.8 mm | ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT |
| Colors | Electro Yellow, Interstellar Gray, White | Black, White, Yellow | Depends |
| Memory card slot | — | ✓ | ZTE nubia Neo 5 |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT | ZTE nubia Neo 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.8 in | 6.8 in |
| Peak brightness | 1300 nits | 1000 nits |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Pixel density | 386 ppi | 314 ppi |
| Display type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
Battery3▾
| ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT | ZTE nubia Neo 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 6000 mAh | 6050 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | — |
Performance4▾
| ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT | ZTE nubia Neo 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Chipset | Unisoc T9100 | Unisoc T9300 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
Camera2▾
| ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT | ZTE nubia Neo 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
Design6▾
| ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT | ZTE nubia Neo 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | — | 210 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | — | — |
| Length | 163.3 mm | 166.1 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 78.8 mm |
| Colors | Electro Yellow, Interstellar Gray, White | Black, White, Yellow |
Memory1▾
| ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT | ZTE nubia Neo 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | — | ✓ |
Platform1▾
| ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT | ZTE nubia Neo 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Features2▾
| ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT | ZTE nubia Neo 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT or ZTE nubia Neo 5?
ZTE nubia Neo 5 has the higher overall score (38 vs 33) and leads in Memory. Choose ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT instead if Peak brightness matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Peak brightness (1300 nits vs 1000 nits) · Pixel density (386 ppi vs 314 ppi) · Display type (AMOLED vs IPS LCD).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 24 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.