ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro vs ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro
ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro — Pick the ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro — it leads these groups: Display 2 Battery 2 Performance 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro wins this comparison with a score of 36/100, ahead of ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro (29).
The main differences: Pixel density (387 ppi vs 431 ppi) · Battery capacity (6000 mAh vs 7050 mAh) · Wired charging (80 W vs 100 W).
Scores are computed from 24 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro if you care about…
- Weight 210 g +19 g vs 229 g
- Thickness 8.5 mm +0.4 mm vs 8.9 mm
Pick the ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro if you care about…
- Screen size 6.8 in +0.0 in vs 6.8 in
- Pixel density 431 ppi +44 ppi vs 387 ppi
- Battery capacity 7050 mAh +1050 mAh vs 6000 mAh
- Wired charging 100 W +20 W vs 80 W
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
11 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro | ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 431 ppi | ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro |
| Battery capacity | 6000 mAh | 7050 mAh | ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 100 W | ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB | ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro |
| Chipset | Unisoc T9100 | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Depends |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | Depends |
| Weight | 210 g | 229 g | ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.9 mm | ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro |
| Length | 166.1 mm | 163.4 mm | ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro |
| Width | 78.8 mm | 76.1 mm | ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro |
| Colors | Gray | Moonlight (Transparent Silver Deuterium), Dusk (Transparent Dark Knight), Shadow (Dark Knight), White Knight, Lightspeed | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro | ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.8 in | 6.8 in |
| Peak brightness | — | 2000 nits |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 431 ppi |
| Display type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
Battery3▾
| ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro | ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 6000 mAh | 7050 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 100 W |
| Wireless charging | — | — |
Performance4▾
| ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro | ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Chipset | Unisoc T9100 | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
Camera2▾
| ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro | ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
Design6▾
| ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro | ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 210 g | 229 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | — | — |
| Length | 166.1 mm | 163.4 mm |
| Width | 78.8 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Colors | Gray | Moonlight (Transparent Silver Deuterium), Dusk (Transparent Dark Knight), Shadow (Dark Knight), White Knight, Lightspeed |
Memory1▾
| ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro | ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | — | — |
Platform1▾
| ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro | ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Features2▾
| ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro | ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro or ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro?
ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro has the higher overall score (36 vs 29) and leads in Display, Battery, Performance. Choose ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro instead if Weight matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Pixel density (387 ppi vs 431 ppi) · Battery capacity (6000 mAh vs 7050 mAh) · Wired charging (80 W vs 100 W).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 24 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.
vivo X Fold6
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold