EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro vs ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro

🏆 Settled

ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro — Pick the ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro — it leads these groups: Display 2 Battery 2 Performance 1

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro wins this comparison with a score of 36/100, ahead of ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro (29).

The main differences: Pixel density (387 ppi vs 431 ppi) · Battery capacity (6000 mAh vs 7050 mAh) · Wired charging (80 W vs 100 W).

Scores are computed from 24 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro

ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro

ZTE
29score / 100
2 wins · 18 tied
🏆 Overall winner ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro

ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro

ZTE
36score / 100
7 wins · 13 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

ZTE nubia Neo 5 ProZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro
Display 25 30
Battery 26 34
Performance 45 64
Camera 22 22
Design 49 66
Platform 9 9
Features 50 50

How to choose

Pick the ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro if you care about…

  • Weight 210 g +19 g vs 229 g
  • Thickness 8.5 mm +0.4 mm vs 8.9 mm

Pick the ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro if you care about…

  • Screen size 6.8 in +0.0 in vs 6.8 in
  • Pixel density 431 ppi +44 ppi vs 387 ppi
  • Battery capacity 7050 mAh +1050 mAh vs 6000 mAh
  • Wired charging 100 W +20 W vs 80 W

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

11 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

ZTE nubia Neo 5 ProZTE nubia Red Magic 10 ProWhere they differ
Pixel density 387 ppi431 ppi ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro
Battery capacity 6000 mAh7050 mAh ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro
Wired charging 80 W100 W ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro
RAM 8 GB12 GB ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro
Chipset Unisoc T9100Snapdragon 8 Elite Depends
OS Android 16Android 15 Depends
Weight 210 g229 g ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro
Thickness 8.5 mm8.9 mm ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro
Length 166.1 mm163.4 mm ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro
Width 78.8 mm76.1 mm ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro
Colors GrayMoonlight (Transparent Silver Deuterium), Dusk (Transparent Dark Knight), Shadow (Dark Knight), White Knight, Lightspeed Depends

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Display5▾
ZTE nubia Neo 5 ProZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro
Screen size 6.8 in 6.8 in
Peak brightness — 2000 nits
Refresh rate 120 Hz —
Pixel density 387 ppi 431 ppi
Display type AMOLED AMOLED
Battery3▾
ZTE nubia Neo 5 ProZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro
Battery capacity 6000 mAh 7050 mAh
Wired charging 80 W 100 W
Wireless charging — —
Performance4▾
ZTE nubia Neo 5 ProZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro
RAM 8 GB 12 GB
Chipset Unisoc T9100 Snapdragon 8 Elite
OS Android 16 Android 15
Storage 256 GB 256 GB
Camera2▾
ZTE nubia Neo 5 ProZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Selfie camera 16 MP 16 MP
Design6▾
ZTE nubia Neo 5 ProZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro
Weight 210 g 229 g
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.9 mm
Water resistant (IP68) — —
Length 166.1 mm 163.4 mm
Width 78.8 mm 76.1 mm
Colors Gray Moonlight (Transparent Silver Deuterium), Dusk (Transparent Dark Knight), Shadow (Dark Knight), White Knight, Lightspeed
Memory1▾
ZTE nubia Neo 5 ProZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro
Memory card slot — —
Platform1▾
ZTE nubia Neo 5 ProZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro
CPU cores 8 8
Features2▾
ZTE nubia Neo 5 ProZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro
Face unlock — —
Fingerprint sensor ✓ ✓

Data sources: GSMArena

FAQ

Which is better, ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro or ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro?

ZTE nubia Red Magic 10 Pro has the higher overall score (36 vs 29) and leads in Display, Battery, Performance. Choose ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro instead if Weight matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Pixel density (387 ppi vs 431 ppi) · Battery capacity (6000 mAh vs 7050 mAh) · Wired charging (80 W vs 100 W).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 24 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.