ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Air vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro — Pick the ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro — it leads these groups: Display 1 Battery 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro wins this comparison with a score of 37/100, ahead of ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Air (34).
The main differences: Peak brightness (1800 nits vs 2000 nits) · Battery capacity (7000 mAh vs 8000 mAh) · Chipset (Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5).
Scores are computed from 24 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Air if you care about…
- Weight 207 g +23 g vs 230 g
- Thickness 8 mm +0.9 mm vs 8.9 mm
Pick the ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro if you care about…
- Peak brightness 2000 nits +200 nits vs 1800 nits
- Battery capacity 8000 mAh +1000 mAh vs 7000 mAh
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Where they differ
6 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Air | ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peak brightness | 1800 nits | 2000 nits | ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro |
| Battery capacity | 7000 mAh | 8000 mAh | ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Depends |
| Weight | 207 g | 230 g | ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Air |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.9 mm | ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Air |
| Colors | Phantom (Transparent Black), Prism (Transparent White) | Black, Silver | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Air | ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.8 in | 6.8 in |
| Peak brightness | 1800 nits | 2000 nits |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Pixel density | 431 ppi | 431 ppi |
| Display type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
Battery3▾
| ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Air | ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 7000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 80 W |
| Wireless charging | — | — |
Performance4▾
| ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Air | ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
Camera2▾
| ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Air | ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
Design6▾
| ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Air | ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 207 g | 230 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | — | — |
| Length | 163.8 mm | 163.8 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Colors | Phantom (Transparent Black), Prism (Transparent White) | Black, Silver |
Memory1▾
| ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Air | ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | — | — |
Platform1▾
| ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Air | ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Features2▾
| ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Air | ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Air or ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro?
ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro has the higher overall score (37 vs 34) and leads in Display, Battery. Choose ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Air instead if Weight matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Peak brightness (1800 nits vs 2000 nits) · Battery capacity (7000 mAh vs 8000 mAh) · Chipset (Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 24 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.