AOC Q2490PXQ vs AOC Q24E11
AOC Q24E11 — Pick the AOC Q24E11 — it leads these groups: Ergonomics 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
AOC Q24E11 wins this comparison with a score of 57/100, ahead of AOC Q2490PXQ (56).
The main differences: Resolution (2560x1440 vs 2560 x 1440 px) · Weight (with stand) (7000 g vs 2770 g).
Scores are computed from 10 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| AOC Q2490PXQ | AOC Q24E11 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 36 | 35 |
| Connectivity | 29 | 29 |
| Ergonomics | 85 | 90 |
How to choose
Pick the AOC Q24E11 if you care about…
- Weight (with stand) 2770 g +4230 g vs 7000 g
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
BENQ EW3270U
SAMSUNG Odyssey G7 32
SAMSUNG Odyssey G5 27
Where they differ
2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| AOC Q2490PXQ | AOC Q24E11 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2560x1440 | 2560 x 1440 px | Depends |
| Weight (with stand) | 7000 g | 2770 g | AOC Q24E11 |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display6▾
| AOC Q2490PXQ | AOC Q24E11 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 23.8 in | 23.8 in |
| Resolution | 2560x1440 | 2560 x 1440 px |
| Max refresh rate | — | 100 Hz |
| Response time | — | 4 ms |
| Brightness | — | 300 cd/m² |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
Connectivity1▾
| AOC Q2490PXQ | AOC Q24E11 | |
|---|---|---|
| Built-in speakers | — | — |
Ergonomics3▾
| AOC Q2490PXQ | AOC Q24E11 | |
|---|---|---|
| Height adjustment | — | ✓ |
| VESA mounting | — | ✓ |
| Weight (with stand) | 7000 g | 2770 g |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, AOC Q2490PXQ or AOC Q24E11?
AOC Q24E11 edges ahead 57 to 56 and leads in Ergonomics.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Resolution (2560x1440 vs 2560 x 1440 px) · Weight (with stand) (7000 g vs 2770 g).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 10 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.