AOC Q27B35 vs AOC Q27G2
AOC Q27G2 — Pick the AOC Q27G2 — it leads these groups: Display 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
AOC Q27G2 wins this comparison with a score of 60/100, ahead of AOC Q27B35 (57).
The main differences: Max refresh rate (100 Hz vs 144 Hz) · Panel type (IPS vs VA) · Weight (with stand) (3120 g vs 4100 g).
Scores are computed from 7 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| AOC Q27B35 | AOC Q27G2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 36 | 48 |
| Ergonomics | 89 | 88 |
How to choose
Pick the AOC Q27B35 if you care about…
- Weight (with stand) 3120 g +980 g vs 4100 g
Pick the AOC Q27G2 if you care about…
- Max refresh rate 144 Hz +44 Hz vs 100 Hz
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
BENQ EW3270U
SAMSUNG Odyssey G7 32
SAMSUNG Odyssey G5 27
Where they differ
3 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| AOC Q27B35 | AOC Q27G2 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max refresh rate | 100 Hz | 144 Hz | AOC Q27G2 |
| Panel type | IPS | VA | Depends |
| Weight (with stand) | 3120 g | 4100 g | AOC Q27B35 |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display6▾
| AOC Q27B35 | AOC Q27G2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 27 in | 27 in |
| Resolution | 2560x1440 | 2560x1440 |
| Max refresh rate | 100 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Response time | — | 1 ms |
| Brightness | — | 350 cd/m² |
| Panel type | IPS | VA |
Ergonomics1▾
| AOC Q27B35 | AOC Q27G2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | 3120 g | 4100 g |
Data sources: Amazon · GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, AOC Q27B35 or AOC Q27G2?
AOC Q27G2 has the higher overall score (60 vs 57) and leads in Display. Choose AOC Q27B35 instead if Weight (with stand) matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Max refresh rate (100 Hz vs 144 Hz) · Panel type (IPS vs VA) · Weight (with stand) (3120 g vs 4100 g).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 7 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.