CA California Institute of Technology vs CA California Miramar University
CA California Institute of Technology — Pick the CA California Institute of Technology — it leads these groups: Students & campus 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
CA California Institute of Technology wins this comparison with a score of 52/100, ahead of CA California Miramar University (42).
The main differences: Acceptance rate (2.6 % vs 18.5 %) · In-state tuition (65898 USD/yr vs 12442 USD/yr) · Out-of-state tuition (65898 USD/yr vs 12442 USD/yr).
Scores are computed from 14 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| CA California Institute of Technology | CA California Miramar University | |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions | 40 | 49 |
| Cost & outcomes | 51 | 56 |
| Rankings | 96 | 48 |
| Students & campus | 1 | 0 |
How to choose
Pick the CA California Institute of Technology if you care about…
- Graduation rate (150%) 94.4 % +44.4 % vs 50 %
- Freshman retention 97.4 % +5.1 % vs 92.3 %
- Undergraduate students 987 +852 vs 135
Pick the CA California Miramar University if you care about…
- Acceptance rate 18.5 % +15.9 % vs 2.6 %
- In-state tuition 12442 USD/yr +53456 USD/yr vs 65898 USD/yr
- Out-of-state tuition 12442 USD/yr +53456 USD/yr vs 65898 USD/yr
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
7 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| CA California Institute of Technology | CA California Miramar University | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 2.6 % | 18.5 % | CA California Miramar University |
| In-state tuition | 65898 USD/yr | 12442 USD/yr | CA California Miramar University |
| Out-of-state tuition | 65898 USD/yr | 12442 USD/yr | CA California Miramar University |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 94.4 % | 50 % | CA California Institute of Technology |
| Freshman retention | 97.4 % | 92.3 % | CA California Institute of Technology |
| Undergraduate students | 987 | 135 | CA California Institute of Technology |
| Ownership | Private nonprofit | Private for-profit | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Admissions1▾
| CA California Institute of Technology | CA California Miramar University | |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 2.6 % | 18.5 % |
Cost & outcomes6▾
| CA California Institute of Technology | CA California Miramar University | |
|---|---|---|
| In-state tuition | 65898 USD/yr | 12442 USD/yr |
| Out-of-state tuition | 65898 USD/yr | 12442 USD/yr |
| Median earnings (10 yr) | 128566 USD | — |
| Earnings >$50k (10 yr) | 88 % | — |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 94.4 % | 50 % |
| Freshman retention | 97.4 % | 92.3 % |
Rankings4▾
| CA California Institute of Technology | CA California Miramar University | |
|---|---|---|
| THE world rank | 7 | — |
| THE overall score | 96.3 | — |
| THE teaching | 96.4 | — |
| THE research | 97.4 | — |
Students & campus3▾
| CA California Institute of Technology | CA California Miramar University | |
|---|---|---|
| Undergraduate students | 987 | 135 |
| Campus setting | City | City |
| Ownership | Private nonprofit | Private for-profit |
Data sources: College Scorecard · Times Higher Education
FAQ
Which is better, CA California Institute of Technology or CA California Miramar University?
CA California Institute of Technology has the higher overall score (52 vs 42) and leads in Students & campus. Choose CA California Miramar University instead if Acceptance rate matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Acceptance rate (2.6 % vs 18.5 %) · In-state tuition (65898 USD/yr vs 12442 USD/yr) · Out-of-state tuition (65898 USD/yr vs 12442 USD/yr).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 14 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.