Dell S3225QS vs Dell S3425DW
The short answer
Dell S3225QS wins this comparison with a score of 61/100, ahead of Dell S3425DW (59).
The main differences: Screen size (31.5 in vs 34 in) · Resolution (3840x2160 vs 3440x1440) · Response time (0.0 ms vs 4 ms).
Scores are computed from 7 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Dell S3225QS | Dell S3425DW | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 51 | 44 |
How to choose
Pick the Dell S3225QS if you care about…
- Response time 0.0 ms +4.0 ms vs 4 ms
Pick the Dell S3425DW if you care about…
- Screen size 34 in +2.5 in vs 31.5 in
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
BENQ EW3270U
SAMSUNG Odyssey G7 32
SAMSUNG Odyssey G5 27
Where they differ
3 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Dell S3225QS | Dell S3425DW | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 31.5 in | 34 in | Dell S3425DW |
| Resolution | 3840x2160 | 3440x1440 | Depends |
| Response time | 0.0 ms | 4 ms | Dell S3225QS |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display7▾
| Dell S3225QS | Dell S3425DW | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 31.5 in | 34 in |
| Resolution | 3840x2160 | 3440x1440 |
| Max refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Response time | 0.0 ms | 4 ms |
| Brightness | 300 cd/m² | — |
| Panel type | VA | VA |
| sRGB coverage | 99 % | — |
Data sources: Amazon · GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Dell S3225QS or Dell S3425DW?
Dell S3225QS edges ahead 61 to 59. Choose Dell S3425DW instead if Screen size matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (31.5 in vs 34 in) · Resolution (3840x2160 vs 3440x1440) · Response time (0.0 ms vs 4 ms).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 7 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.