EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

DJI Mavic 4 Pro vs DJI Mini 2 SE

🏆 Settled

DJI Mavic 4 Pro — Pick the DJI Mavic 4 Pro — it leads these groups: Camera 1

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

DJI Mavic 4 Pro wins this comparison with a score of 79/100, ahead of DJI Mini 2 SE (55).

The main differences: Camera resolution (100 MP vs 12 MP) · Max video (6K60 HDR vs 2.7K).

Scores are computed from 7 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

🏆 Overall winner DJI Mavic 4 Pro

DJI Mavic 4 Pro

DJI
79score / 100
1 win · 5 tied
DJI Mini 2 SE

DJI Mini 2 SE

DJI
55score / 100
0 wins · 6 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

DJI Mavic 4 ProDJI Mini 2 SE
Design 79 90
Flight 100 67
Camera 100 8
Value 0 62

How to choose

Pick the DJI Mavic 4 Pro if you care about…

  • Camera resolution 100 MP +88 MP vs 12 MP

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

DJI Mavic 4 ProDJI Mini 2 SEWhere they differ
Camera resolution 100 MP12 MP DJI Mavic 4 Pro
Max video 6K60 HDR2.7K Depends

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Design1▾
DJI Mavic 4 ProDJI Mini 2 SE
Weight 1063 g —
Flight3▾
DJI Mavic 4 ProDJI Mini 2 SE
Max flight time 51 min —
Omnidirectional obstacle sensing ✓ —
Transmission range 30 km —
Camera2▾
DJI Mavic 4 ProDJI Mini 2 SE
Camera resolution 100 MP 12 MP
Max video 6K60 HDR 2.7K
Value1▾
DJI Mavic 4 ProDJI Mini 2 SE
Price 1999 USD —

Data sources: Amazon

FAQ

Which is better, DJI Mavic 4 Pro or DJI Mini 2 SE?

DJI Mavic 4 Pro has the higher overall score (79 vs 55) and leads in Camera.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Camera resolution (100 MP vs 12 MP) · Max video (6K60 HDR vs 2.7K).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 7 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.