EIZO ColorEdge CG2700X vs EIZO EIZO EV3237
EIZO EIZO EV3237 — Pick the EIZO EIZO EV3237 — it leads these groups: Display 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
EIZO EIZO EV3237 wins this comparison with a score of 62/100, ahead of EIZO ColorEdge CG2700X (59).
The main differences: Screen size (26.9 in vs 31.5 in).
Scores are computed from 8 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| EIZO ColorEdge CG2700X | EIZO EIZO EV3237 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 39 | 44 |
| Ergonomics | 80 | 86 |
How to choose
Pick the EIZO EIZO EV3237 if you care about…
- Screen size 31.5 in +4.6 in vs 26.9 in
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
MSI Optix MAG274QRF
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
LG UltraFine 27UL500
BENQ EW3270U
Where they differ
1 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| EIZO ColorEdge CG2700X | EIZO EIZO EV3237 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 26.9 in | 31.5 in | EIZO EIZO EV3237 |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display7▾
| EIZO ColorEdge CG2700X | EIZO EIZO EV3237 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 26.9 in | 31.5 in |
| Resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Max refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Response time | 13 ms | — |
| Brightness | 1713 cd/m² | — |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| sRGB coverage | 98 % | — |
Ergonomics1▾
| EIZO ColorEdge CG2700X | EIZO EIZO EV3237 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | 9800 g | — |
Data sources: Amazon · GSMArena · ZOL
FAQ
Which is better, EIZO ColorEdge CG2700X or EIZO EIZO EV3237?
EIZO EIZO EV3237 has the higher overall score (62 vs 59) and leads in Display.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (26.9 in vs 31.5 in).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 8 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.