EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

Hisense 55E5Q vs Skyworth 100A4F

The short answer

Hisense 55E5Q wins this comparison with a score of 88/100, ahead of Skyworth 100A4F (87).

The main differences: Native refresh rate (264 Hz vs 288 Hz) · Smart TV platform (Android11 vs Coocaa OS).

Scores are computed from 3 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

🏆 Overall winner Hisense 55E5Q

Hisense 55E5Q

Hisense
88score / 100
0 wins · 2 tied ZOL Users ★ 5.0 (139)
Skyworth 100A4F

Skyworth 100A4F

Skyworth
87score / 100
1 win · 1 tie ZOL Users ★ 5.0 (49)

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Hisense 55E5QSkyworth 100A4F
Display 79 78
Smart 100 100

How to choose

Pick the Skyworth 100A4F if you care about…

  • Native refresh rate 288 Hz +24 Hz vs 264 Hz

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

Hisense 55E5QSkyworth 100A4FWhere they differ
Native refresh rate 264 Hz288 Hz Skyworth 100A4F
Smart TV platform Android11Coocaa OS Depends

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Display2▾
Hisense 55E5QSkyworth 100A4F
Native refresh rate 264 Hz 288 Hz
Brightness 1300 cd/m² —
Smart1▾
Hisense 55E5QSkyworth 100A4F
Smart TV platform Android11 Coocaa OS

Data sources: GSMArena

FAQ

Which is better, Hisense 55E5Q or Skyworth 100A4F?

Hisense 55E5Q edges ahead 88 to 87. Choose Skyworth 100A4F instead if Native refresh rate matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Native refresh rate (264 Hz vs 288 Hz) · Smart TV platform (Android11 vs Coocaa OS).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 3 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.