Hisense 55E5Q vs Skyworth 100A4F
The short answer
Hisense 55E5Q wins this comparison with a score of 88/100, ahead of Skyworth 100A4F (87).
The main differences: Native refresh rate (264 Hz vs 288 Hz) · Smart TV platform (Android11 vs Coocaa OS).
Scores are computed from 3 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Skyworth 100A4F if you care about…
- Native refresh rate 288 Hz +24 Hz vs 264 Hz
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Hisense 55E5Q | Skyworth 100A4F | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Native refresh rate | 264 Hz | 288 Hz | Skyworth 100A4F |
| Smart TV platform | Android11 | Coocaa OS | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display2▾
| Hisense 55E5Q | Skyworth 100A4F | |
|---|---|---|
| Native refresh rate | 264 Hz | 288 Hz |
| Brightness | 1300 cd/m² | — |
Smart1▾
| Hisense 55E5Q | Skyworth 100A4F | |
|---|---|---|
| Smart TV platform | Android11 | Coocaa OS |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Hisense 55E5Q or Skyworth 100A4F?
Hisense 55E5Q edges ahead 88 to 87. Choose Skyworth 100A4F instead if Native refresh rate matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Native refresh rate (264 Hz vs 288 Hz) · Smart TV platform (Android11 vs Coocaa OS).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 3 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.
Samsung MRA115MR95FXXZ
Xiaomi S Pro Mini LED 2026 98-inch
Xiaomi S Pro Mini LED 2026 65-inch
Hisense 85E3Q
Hisense 50E5Q
Xiaomi TV S Pro 85 Mini LED