HKC B4000 vs HKC C299Q
The short answer
HKC B4000 wins this comparison with a score of 56.2/100, ahead of HKC C299Q (56.1).
The main differences: Resolution (1920x1080 vs 2560x1080) · Max refresh rate (60 Hz vs 75 Hz) · Panel type (AD-PLS vs VA).
Scores are computed from 4 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| HKC B4000 | HKC C299Q | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 34 | 35 |
| Ergonomics | 90 | 88 |
How to choose
Pick the HKC C299Q if you care about…
- Max refresh rate 75 Hz +15 Hz vs 60 Hz
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
3 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| HKC B4000 | HKC C299Q | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 2560x1080 | Depends |
| Max refresh rate | 60 Hz | 75 Hz | HKC C299Q |
| Panel type | AD-PLS | VA | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display3▾
| HKC B4000 | HKC C299Q | |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 2560x1080 |
| Max refresh rate | 60 Hz | 75 Hz |
| Panel type | AD-PLS | VA |
Ergonomics1▾
| HKC B4000 | HKC C299Q | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | 3000 g | — |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, HKC B4000 or HKC C299Q?
HKC B4000 edges ahead 56 to 56. Choose HKC C299Q instead if Max refresh rate matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Resolution (1920x1080 vs 2560x1080) · Max refresh rate (60 Hz vs 75 Hz) · Panel type (AD-PLS vs VA).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 4 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.
GIGABYTE M27Q
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
BENQ EW3270U
SAMSUNG Odyssey G7 32
SAMSUNG Odyssey G5 27