EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

HKC B4000 vs HKC C299Q

The short answer

HKC B4000 wins this comparison with a score of 56.2/100, ahead of HKC C299Q (56.1).

The main differences: Resolution (1920x1080 vs 2560x1080) · Max refresh rate (60 Hz vs 75 Hz) · Panel type (AD-PLS vs VA).

Scores are computed from 4 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

🏆 Overall winner HKC B4000

HKC B4000

HKC
56score / 100
0 wins · 2 tied ZOL Users ★ 4.2 (27)
HKC C299Q

HKC C299Q

HKC
56score / 100
1 win · 1 tie ZOL Users ★ 5.0 (513)

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

HKC B4000HKC C299Q
Display 34 35
Ergonomics 90 88

How to choose

Pick the HKC C299Q if you care about…

  • Max refresh rate 75 Hz +15 Hz vs 60 Hz

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

3 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

HKC B4000HKC C299QWhere they differ
Resolution 1920x10802560x1080 Depends
Max refresh rate 60 Hz75 Hz HKC C299Q
Panel type AD-PLSVA Depends

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Display3▾
HKC B4000HKC C299Q
Resolution 1920x1080 2560x1080
Max refresh rate 60 Hz 75 Hz
Panel type AD-PLS VA
Ergonomics1▾
HKC B4000HKC C299Q
Weight (with stand) 3000 g —

Data sources: GSMArena

FAQ

Which is better, HKC B4000 or HKC C299Q?

HKC B4000 edges ahead 56 to 56. Choose HKC C299Q instead if Max refresh rate matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Resolution (1920x1080 vs 2560x1080) · Max refresh rate (60 Hz vs 75 Hz) · Panel type (AD-PLS vs VA).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 4 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.