JUHOR 32GB 16GB*2 DDR5 6000 C28 vs JUHOR 32GB 16GB*2 DDR5 6000 C40
JUHOR 32GB 16GB*2 DDR5 6000 C28 — Pick the JUHOR 32GB 16GB*2 DDR5 6000 C28 — it leads these groups: Speed 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
JUHOR 32GB 16GB*2 DDR5 6000 C28 wins this comparison with a score of 51/100, ahead of JUHOR 32GB 16GB*2 DDR5 6000 C40 (45).
The main differences: CAS latency (30 vs 38).
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the JUHOR 32GB 16GB*2 DDR5 6000 C28 if you care about…
- CAS latency 30 +8 vs 38
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Crucial DDR5 5600
Crucial DDR5 5600 SO-DIMM
ASGARD 16GB 8Gx2 DDR4 3600
JUHOR 32GB DDR5 6000 C40
JUHOR 16GB DDR5 6000 C28
G.SKILL V 16GB DDR4 2400 F4-2400C15D-16GVR
Where they differ
1 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| JUHOR 32GB 16GB*2 DDR5 6000 C28 | JUHOR 32GB 16GB*2 DDR5 6000 C40 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAS latency | 30 | 38 | JUHOR 32GB 16GB*2 DDR5 6000 C28 |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Speed2▾
| JUHOR 32GB 16GB*2 DDR5 6000 C28 | JUHOR 32GB 16GB*2 DDR5 6000 C40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory speed | 6000 MT/s | 6000 MT/s |
| CAS latency | 30 | 38 |
Specs3▾
| JUHOR 32GB 16GB*2 DDR5 6000 C28 | JUHOR 32GB 16GB*2 DDR5 6000 C40 | |
|---|---|---|
| DDR generation | 5 | 5 |
| Module size | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Voltage | 1.4 V | 1.4 V |
Data sources: Amazon
FAQ
Which is better, JUHOR 32GB 16GB*2 DDR5 6000 C28 or JUHOR 32GB 16GB*2 DDR5 6000 C40?
JUHOR 32GB 16GB*2 DDR5 6000 C28 has the higher overall score (51 vs 45) and leads in Speed.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: CAS latency (30 vs 38).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.