Logitech PRO X SUPERLIGHT GPW vs Logitech G Pro X Superlight Wireless Gaming Mouse
The short answer
Logitech G Pro X Superlight Wireless Gaming Mouse wins this comparison with a score of 49.7/100, ahead of Logitech PRO X SUPERLIGHT GPW (49.5).
Scores are computed from 6 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
Logitech G Pro X Superlight Wireless Gaming Mouse
LogitechAt a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Logitech PRO X SUPERLIGHT GPW | Logitech G Pro X Superlight Wireless Gaming Mouse | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 63 | 63 |
| Design | 33 | 30 |
| Connect | 64 | 68 |
| Battery | 4 | 4 |
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Razer Viper V3 Pro
Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2
Zowie EC2-CW
Glorious Model I 2
Pulsar X2V2 Mini
Logitech MX Master 3S
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Performance2▾
| Logitech PRO X SUPERLIGHT GPW | Logitech G Pro X Superlight Wireless Gaming Mouse | |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | — | 25600 DPI |
| Sensor | — | Optical |
Design1▾
| Logitech PRO X SUPERLIGHT GPW | Logitech G Pro X Superlight Wireless Gaming Mouse | |
|---|---|---|
| Buttons | — | 5 |
Connect2▾
| Logitech PRO X SUPERLIGHT GPW | Logitech G Pro X Superlight Wireless Gaming Mouse | |
|---|---|---|
| Wired | — | — |
| 2.4GHz wireless | ✓ | — |
Battery1▾
| Logitech PRO X SUPERLIGHT GPW | Logitech G Pro X Superlight Wireless Gaming Mouse | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | — | 70 h |
Data sources: Amazon · GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Logitech PRO X SUPERLIGHT GPW or Logitech G Pro X Superlight Wireless Gaming Mouse?
Logitech G Pro X Superlight Wireless Gaming Mouse edges ahead 50 to 50.
What are the main differences?
Scores are computed from 6 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 6 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.