EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

MCHOSE G75 Pro vs MCHOSE G75 V2

The short answer

MCHOSE G75 Pro wins this comparison with a score of 72/100, ahead of MCHOSE G75 V2 (69).

The main differences: Layout (ANSI (United States) vs 75%配列) · Key count (71 vs 75) · Switch type (Cabbage Tofu Switch vs 冰蓝轴).

Scores are computed from 7 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

🏆 Overall winner MCHOSE G75 Pro

MCHOSE G75 Pro

MCHOSE
72score / 100
0 wins · 5 tied ZOL Users ★ 4.9 (503)
MCHOSE G75 V2

MCHOSE G75 V2

MCHOSE
69score / 100
1 win · 4 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

MCHOSE G75 ProMCHOSE G75 V2
Design 85 67
Connect 87 87

How to choose

Pick the MCHOSE G75 V2 if you care about…

  • Key count 75 +4 vs 71

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

3 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

MCHOSE G75 ProMCHOSE G75 V2Where they differ
Layout ANSI (United States)75%配列 Depends
Key count 7175 MCHOSE G75 V2
Switch type Cabbage Tofu Switch冰蓝轴 Depends

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Design5▾
MCHOSE G75 ProMCHOSE G75 V2
Layout ANSI (United States) 75%配列
Hot-swappable ✓ —
Per-key RGB ✓ —
Key count 71 75
Weight 1030 g —
Connect1▾
MCHOSE G75 ProMCHOSE G75 V2
2.4GHz wireless ✓ ✓
Feel1▾
MCHOSE G75 ProMCHOSE G75 V2
Switch type Cabbage Tofu Switch 冰蓝轴

Data sources: ZOL

FAQ

Which is better, MCHOSE G75 Pro or MCHOSE G75 V2?

MCHOSE G75 Pro has the higher overall score (72 vs 69). Choose MCHOSE G75 V2 instead if Key count matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Layout (ANSI (United States) vs 75%配列) · Key count (71 vs 75) · Switch type (Cabbage Tofu Switch vs 冰蓝轴).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 7 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.