OH Miami University-Oxford vs MI Michigan State University
OH Miami University-Oxford — Pick the OH Miami University-Oxford — it leads these groups: Admissions 2
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
OH Miami University-Oxford wins this comparison with a score of 47/100, ahead of MI Michigan State University (45).
The main differences: Acceptance rate (75.4 % vs 84.8 %) · Average SAT (1317 vs 1269) · Average ACT (27 vs 26).
Scores are computed from 16 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| OH Miami University-Oxford | MI Michigan State University | |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions | 64 | 64 |
| Cost & outcomes | 52 | 54 |
| Rankings | 48 | 31 |
| Students & campus | 10 | 25 |
How to choose
Pick the OH Miami University-Oxford if you care about…
- Average SAT 1317 +48 vs 1269
- Average ACT 27 +1 vs 26
- Out-of-state tuition 41221 USD/yr +2621 USD/yr vs 43842 USD/yr
- Freshman retention 90.1 % +0.1 % vs 90.0 %
Pick the MI Michigan State University if you care about…
- Acceptance rate 84.8 % +9.4 % vs 75.4 %
- In-state tuition 16458 USD/yr +1703 USD/yr vs 18161 USD/yr
- Median earnings (10 yr) 67253 USD +12177 USD vs 55076 USD
- Earnings >$50k (10 yr) 82.3 % +5.7 % vs 76.6 %
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
11 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| OH Miami University-Oxford | MI Michigan State University | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 75.4 % | 84.8 % | MI Michigan State University |
| Average SAT | 1317 | 1269 | OH Miami University-Oxford |
| Average ACT | 27 | 26 | OH Miami University-Oxford |
| In-state tuition | 18161 USD/yr | 16458 USD/yr | MI Michigan State University |
| Out-of-state tuition | 41221 USD/yr | 43842 USD/yr | OH Miami University-Oxford |
| Median earnings (10 yr) | 55076 USD | 67253 USD | MI Michigan State University |
| Earnings >$50k (10 yr) | 76.6 % | 82.3 % | MI Michigan State University |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 79.8 % | 80.7 % | MI Michigan State University |
| Freshman retention | 90.1 % | 90.0 % | OH Miami University-Oxford |
| Undergraduate students | 16656 | 40922 | MI Michigan State University |
| Campus setting | Town | City | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Admissions3▾
| OH Miami University-Oxford | MI Michigan State University | |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 75.4 % | 84.8 % |
| Average SAT | 1317 | 1269 |
| Average ACT | 27 | 26 |
Cost & outcomes6▾
| OH Miami University-Oxford | MI Michigan State University | |
|---|---|---|
| In-state tuition | 18161 USD/yr | 16458 USD/yr |
| Out-of-state tuition | 41221 USD/yr | 43842 USD/yr |
| Median earnings (10 yr) | 55076 USD | 67253 USD |
| Earnings >$50k (10 yr) | 76.6 % | 82.3 % |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 79.8 % | 80.7 % |
| Freshman retention | 90.1 % | 90.0 % |
Rankings4▾
| OH Miami University-Oxford | MI Michigan State University | |
|---|---|---|
| THE world rank | — | 105 |
| THE overall score | — | 65.7 |
| THE teaching | — | 57.1 |
| THE research | — | 55.9 |
Students & campus3▾
| OH Miami University-Oxford | MI Michigan State University | |
|---|---|---|
| Undergraduate students | 16656 | 40922 |
| Campus setting | Town | City |
| Ownership | Public | Public |
Data sources: College Scorecard · Times Higher Education
FAQ
Which is better, OH Miami University-Oxford or MI Michigan State University?
OH Miami University-Oxford edges ahead 47 to 45 and leads in Admissions. Choose MI Michigan State University instead if Acceptance rate matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Acceptance rate (75.4 % vs 84.8 %) · Average SAT (1317 vs 1269) · Average ACT (27 vs 26).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 16 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.