NY Rochester Institute of Technology vs IN Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
IN Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology — Pick the IN Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology — it leads these groups: Cost & outcomes 6 Admissions 2
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
IN Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology wins this comparison with a score of 47/100, ahead of NY Rochester Institute of Technology (45).
The main differences: Acceptance rate (66.9 % vs 76.9 %) · Average SAT (1383 vs 1427) · In-state tuition (59274 USD/yr vs 58649 USD/yr).
Scores are computed from 12 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| NY Rochester Institute of Technology | IN Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology | |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions | 72 | 78 |
| Cost & outcomes | 39 | 46 |
| Students & campus | 8 | 1 |
How to choose
Pick the NY Rochester Institute of Technology if you care about…
- Undergraduate students 13215 +10906 vs 2309
Pick the IN Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology if you care about…
- Acceptance rate 76.9 % +9.9 % vs 66.9 %
- Average SAT 1427 +44 vs 1383
- In-state tuition 58649 USD/yr +625 USD/yr vs 59274 USD/yr
- Out-of-state tuition 58649 USD/yr +625 USD/yr vs 59274 USD/yr
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
10 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| NY Rochester Institute of Technology | IN Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 66.9 % | 76.9 % | IN Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology |
| Average SAT | 1383 | 1427 | IN Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology |
| In-state tuition | 59274 USD/yr | 58649 USD/yr | IN Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology |
| Out-of-state tuition | 59274 USD/yr | 58649 USD/yr | IN Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology |
| Median earnings (10 yr) | 76571 USD | 101253 USD | IN Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology |
| Earnings >$50k (10 yr) | 83.2 % | 93 % | IN Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 69.9 % | 78.2 % | IN Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology |
| Freshman retention | 88.8 % | 91.7 % | IN Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology |
| Undergraduate students | 13215 | 2309 | NY Rochester Institute of Technology |
| Campus setting | Suburban | City | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Admissions3▾
| NY Rochester Institute of Technology | IN Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology | |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 66.9 % | 76.9 % |
| Average SAT | 1383 | 1427 |
| Average ACT | 31 | 31 |
Cost & outcomes6▾
| NY Rochester Institute of Technology | IN Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology | |
|---|---|---|
| In-state tuition | 59274 USD/yr | 58649 USD/yr |
| Out-of-state tuition | 59274 USD/yr | 58649 USD/yr |
| Median earnings (10 yr) | 76571 USD | 101253 USD |
| Earnings >$50k (10 yr) | 83.2 % | 93 % |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 69.9 % | 78.2 % |
| Freshman retention | 88.8 % | 91.7 % |
Students & campus3▾
| NY Rochester Institute of Technology | IN Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology | |
|---|---|---|
| Undergraduate students | 13215 | 2309 |
| Campus setting | Suburban | City |
| Ownership | Private nonprofit | Private nonprofit |
Data sources: College Scorecard
FAQ
Which is better, NY Rochester Institute of Technology or IN Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology?
IN Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology edges ahead 47 to 45 and leads in Cost & outcomes, Admissions. Choose NY Rochester Institute of Technology instead if Undergraduate students matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Acceptance rate (66.9 % vs 76.9 %) · Average SAT (1383 vs 1427) · In-state tuition (59274 USD/yr vs 58649 USD/yr).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 12 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.