Samsung C24F390FHC vs Samsung C27F390FHC
Samsung C27F390FHC — Pick the Samsung C27F390FHC — it leads these groups: Display 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Samsung C27F390FHC wins this comparison with a score of 60.8/100, ahead of Samsung C24F390FHC (60.8).
The main differences: Screen size (23.5 in vs 27 in) · Weight (with stand) (3300 g vs 6100 g).
Scores are computed from 4 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Samsung C24F390FHC | Samsung C27F390FHC | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 39 | 41 |
| Ergonomics | 87 | 84 |
How to choose
Pick the Samsung C24F390FHC if you care about…
- Weight (with stand) 3300 g +2800 g vs 6100 g
Pick the Samsung C27F390FHC if you care about…
- Screen size 27 in +3.5 in vs 23.5 in
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
MSI Optix MAG274QRF
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
LG UltraFine 27UL500
BENQ EW3270U
Where they differ
2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Samsung C24F390FHC | Samsung C27F390FHC | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 23.5 in | 27 in | Samsung C27F390FHC |
| Weight (with stand) | 3300 g | 6100 g | Samsung C24F390FHC |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display3▾
| Samsung C24F390FHC | Samsung C27F390FHC | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 23.5 in | 27 in |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Panel type | VA | VA |
Ergonomics1▾
| Samsung C24F390FHC | Samsung C27F390FHC | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | 3300 g | 6100 g |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Samsung C24F390FHC or Samsung C27F390FHC?
Samsung C27F390FHC edges ahead 61 to 61 and leads in Display. Choose Samsung C24F390FHC instead if Weight (with stand) matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (23.5 in vs 27 in) · Weight (with stand) (3300 g vs 6100 g).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 4 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.