Sharp Aquos R11 vs Sharp Aquos R7s
Sharp Aquos R7s — Pick the Sharp Aquos R7s — it leads these groups: Display 2 Memory 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Sharp Aquos R7s wins this comparison with a score of 42/100, ahead of Sharp Aquos R11 (38).
The main differences: Screen size (6.5 in vs 6.6 in) · Refresh rate (240 Hz vs 120 Hz) · Pixel density (396 ppi vs 456 ppi).
Scores are computed from 24 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Sharp Aquos R11 if you care about…
- Refresh rate 240 Hz +120 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Battery capacity 5100 mAh +100 mAh vs 5000 mAh
- Wired charging 36 W +9 W vs 27 W
- Main camera 50.3 MP +3.1 MP vs 47.2 MP
Pick the Sharp Aquos R7s if you care about…
- Screen size 6.6 in +0.1 in vs 6.5 in
- Pixel density 456 ppi +60 ppi vs 396 ppi
- Memory card slot ✓ vs —
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Where they differ
16 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Sharp Aquos R11 | Sharp Aquos R7s | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.5 in | 6.6 in | Sharp Aquos R7s |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 120 Hz | Sharp Aquos R11 |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 456 ppi | Sharp Aquos R7s |
| Display type | PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | PRO IGZO OLED | Depends |
| Battery capacity | 5100 mAh | 5000 mAh | Sharp Aquos R11 |
| Wired charging | 36 W | 27 W | Sharp Aquos R11 |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Depends |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 13 | Depends |
| Main camera | 50.3 MP | 47.2 MP | Sharp Aquos R11 |
| Selfie camera | 50.3 MP | 12.6 MP | Sharp Aquos R11 |
| Weight | 195 g | 208 g | Sharp Aquos R11 |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 9.3 mm | Sharp Aquos R11 |
| Length | 156 mm | 161 mm | Sharp Aquos R11 |
| Width | 74 mm | 77 mm | Sharp Aquos R11 |
| Colors | Navy, Ivory, Terracotta | Black | Depends |
| Memory card slot | — | ✓ | Sharp Aquos R7s |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Sharp Aquos R11 | Sharp Aquos R7s | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.5 in | 6.6 in |
| Peak brightness | 3600 nits | — |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 456 ppi |
| Display type | PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | PRO IGZO OLED |
Battery3▾
| Sharp Aquos R11 | Sharp Aquos R7s | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 5100 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 36 W | 27 W |
| Wireless charging | — | — |
Performance4▾
| Sharp Aquos R11 | Sharp Aquos R7s | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 13 |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
Camera2▾
| Sharp Aquos R11 | Sharp Aquos R7s | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50.3 MP | 47.2 MP |
| Selfie camera | 50.3 MP | 12.6 MP |
Design6▾
| Sharp Aquos R11 | Sharp Aquos R7s | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 195 g | 208 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 9.3 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Length | 156 mm | 161 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 77 mm |
| Colors | Navy, Ivory, Terracotta | Black |
Memory1▾
| Sharp Aquos R11 | Sharp Aquos R7s | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | — | ✓ |
Platform1▾
| Sharp Aquos R11 | Sharp Aquos R7s | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Features2▾
| Sharp Aquos R11 | Sharp Aquos R7s | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Sharp Aquos R11 or Sharp Aquos R7s?
Sharp Aquos R7s has the higher overall score (42 vs 38) and leads in Display, Memory. Choose Sharp Aquos R11 instead if Refresh rate matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (6.5 in vs 6.6 in) · Refresh rate (240 Hz vs 120 Hz) · Pixel density (396 ppi vs 456 ppi).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 24 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.