Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC vs Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2
Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC — Pick the Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC — it leads these groups: Battery 1 Connectivity 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC wins this comparison with a score of 62/100, ahead of Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 (60).
The main differences: Battery life (60 h vs 50 h) · Impedance (36 Ω vs 32 Ω) · Bluetooth version (5.3 vs 5.2).
Scores are computed from 15 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC | Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | 49 | 49 |
| Features | 100 | 100 |
| Battery | 47 | 37 |
| Audio | 35 | 36 |
| Connectivity | 84 | 82 |
How to choose
Pick the Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC if you care about…
- Battery life 60 h +10 h vs 50 h
- Bluetooth version 5.3 +0.1 vs 5.2
Pick the Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 if you care about…
- Impedance 32 Ω +4 Ω vs 36 Ω
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Sony WH-1000XM6
Sony WH-1000XM5
Sony WH-1000XM4
Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless
JBL Live 770NC
JBL Tour One M2
Where they differ
3 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC | Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 60 h | 50 h | Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC |
| Impedance | 36 Ω | 32 Ω | Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 | Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Design3▾
| Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC | Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 332 g | 332 g |
| Sweat/water resistance | — | — |
| Foldable design | ✓ | ✓ |
Features2▾
| Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC | Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Active noise cancellation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Built-in microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
Battery2▾
| Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC | Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 60 h | 50 h |
| Charge time | — | 2.5 h |
Audio5▾
| Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC | Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Driver unit | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Impedance | 36 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20000 Hz | 20000 Hz |
| LDAC | — | — |
Connectivity3▾
| Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC | Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Multipoint connection | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB-C charging | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC or Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2?
Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC edges ahead 62 to 60 and leads in Battery, Connectivity. Choose Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 instead if Impedance matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Battery life (60 h vs 50 h) · Impedance (36 Ω vs 32 Ω) · Bluetooth version (5.3 vs 5.2).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 15 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.