TCL 27C3A Pro vs TCL TCL 25P2A Pro
The short answer
TCL TCL 25P2A Pro wins this comparison with a score of 63/100, ahead of TCL 27C3A Pro (61).
The main differences: Screen size (27 in vs 25 in) · Resolution (3840*2160 vs 2560x1440) · Max refresh rate (165 Hz vs 360 Hz).
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| TCL 27C3A Pro | TCL TCL 25P2A Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 42 | 46 |
| Ergonomics | 86 | 87 |
How to choose
Pick the TCL 27C3A Pro if you care about…
- Screen size 27 in +2 in vs 25 in
Pick the TCL TCL 25P2A Pro if you care about…
- Max refresh rate 360 Hz +195 Hz vs 165 Hz
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
MSI Optix MAG274QRF
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
LG UltraFine 27UL500
BENQ EW3270U
Where they differ
4 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| TCL 27C3A Pro | TCL TCL 25P2A Pro | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 27 in | 25 in | TCL 27C3A Pro |
| Resolution | 3840*2160 | 2560x1440 | Depends |
| Max refresh rate | 165 Hz | 360 Hz | TCL TCL 25P2A Pro |
| Panel type | Fast HVA | Mini-LED | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display4▾
| TCL 27C3A Pro | TCL TCL 25P2A Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 27 in | 25 in |
| Resolution | 3840*2160 | 2560x1440 |
| Max refresh rate | 165 Hz | 360 Hz |
| Panel type | Fast HVA | Mini-LED |
Ergonomics1▾
| TCL 27C3A Pro | TCL TCL 25P2A Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | — | 3300 g |
FAQ
Which is better, TCL 27C3A Pro or TCL TCL 25P2A Pro?
TCL TCL 25P2A Pro edges ahead 63 to 61. Choose TCL 27C3A Pro instead if Screen size matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (27 in vs 25 in) · Resolution (3840*2160 vs 2560x1440) · Max refresh rate (165 Hz vs 360 Hz).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.