Technics EAH-A800 vs Ugreen HiTune Max5c
Ugreen HiTune Max5c — Pick the Ugreen HiTune Max5c — it leads these groups: Battery 2 Design 1 Connectivity 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Ugreen HiTune Max5c wins this comparison with a score of 72/100, ahead of Technics EAH-A800 (68).
The main differences: Weight (298 g vs 260 g) · Battery life (50 h vs 75 h) · Charge time (3 h vs 1.5 h).
Scores are computed from 15 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Technics EAH-A800 | Ugreen HiTune Max5c | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | 52 | 56 |
| Features | 100 | 100 |
| Battery | 33 | 58 |
| Audio | 82 | 65 |
| Connectivity | 82 | 86 |
How to choose
Pick the Technics EAH-A800 if you care about…
- Lowest frequency 4 Hz +16 Hz vs 20 Hz
Pick the Ugreen HiTune Max5c if you care about…
- Weight 260 g +38 g vs 298 g
- Battery life 75 h +25 h vs 50 h
- Charge time 1.5 h +1.5 h vs 3 h
- Impedance 32 Ω +2 Ω vs 34 Ω
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
6 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Technics EAH-A800 | Ugreen HiTune Max5c | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | 298 g | 260 g | Ugreen HiTune Max5c |
| Battery life | 50 h | 75 h | Ugreen HiTune Max5c |
| Charge time | 3 h | 1.5 h | Ugreen HiTune Max5c |
| Impedance | 34 Ω | 32 Ω | Ugreen HiTune Max5c |
| Lowest frequency | 4 Hz | 20 Hz | Technics EAH-A800 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 | Ugreen HiTune Max5c |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Design3▾
| Technics EAH-A800 | Ugreen HiTune Max5c | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 298 g | 260 g |
| Sweat/water resistance | — | — |
| Foldable design | ✓ | ✓ |
Features2▾
| Technics EAH-A800 | Ugreen HiTune Max5c | |
|---|---|---|
| Active noise cancellation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Built-in microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
Battery2▾
| Technics EAH-A800 | Ugreen HiTune Max5c | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 50 h | 75 h |
| Charge time | 3 h | 1.5 h |
Audio5▾
| Technics EAH-A800 | Ugreen HiTune Max5c | |
|---|---|---|
| Driver unit | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Impedance | 34 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Lowest frequency | 4 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40000 Hz | 40000 Hz |
| LDAC | ✓ | ✓ |
Connectivity3▾
| Technics EAH-A800 | Ugreen HiTune Max5c | |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Multipoint connection | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB-C charging | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Technics EAH-A800 or Ugreen HiTune Max5c?
Ugreen HiTune Max5c has the higher overall score (72 vs 68) and leads in Battery, Design, Connectivity. Choose Technics EAH-A800 instead if Lowest frequency matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Weight (298 g vs 260 g) · Battery life (50 h vs 75 h) · Charge time (3 h vs 1.5 h).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 15 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.
Sony WH-1000XM6
Sony WH-1000XM5
Sony WH-1000XM4
Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless
JBL Live 770NC
JBL Tour One M2