Archer Be700 Pro vs Archer Be800
Archer Be800 — Pick the Archer Be800 — it leads these groups: Wireless 1 Ports 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Archer Be800 wins this comparison with a score of 64/100, ahead of Archer Be700 Pro (58).
The main differences: Wi-Fi speed (15000 Mb/s vs 19000 Mb/s) · LAN ports (6 vs 7).
Scores are computed from 3 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Archer Be800 if you care about…
- Wi-Fi speed 19000 Mb/s +4000 Mb/s vs 15000 Mb/s
- LAN ports 7 +1 vs 6
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
ASUS RT-BE88U
Amazon Eero Pro 6
ASUS Asus TUF Gaming BE3600
ASUS Asus TUF Gaming AX4200
ASUS Asus TUF Gaming AX3000 V2
ASUS Asus RT-BE82U
Where they differ
2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Archer Be700 Pro | Archer Be800 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wi-Fi speed | 15000 Mb/s | 19000 Mb/s | Archer Be800 |
| LAN ports | 6 | 7 | Archer Be800 |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Wireless1▾
| Archer Be700 Pro | Archer Be800 | |
|---|---|---|
| Wi-Fi speed | 15000 Mb/s | 19000 Mb/s |
Hardware1▾
| Archer Be700 Pro | Archer Be800 | |
|---|---|---|
| External antennas | — | 8 |
Ports1▾
| Archer Be700 Pro | Archer Be800 | |
|---|---|---|
| LAN ports | 6 | 7 |
Data sources: Amazon
FAQ
Which is better, Archer Be700 Pro or Archer Be800?
Archer Be800 has the higher overall score (64 vs 58) and leads in Wireless, Ports.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Wi-Fi speed (15000 Mb/s vs 19000 Mb/s) · LAN ports (6 vs 7).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 3 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.