Archer Ge650 vs Archer Ge800
Archer Ge800 — Pick the Archer Ge800 — it leads these groups: Wireless 1 Hardware 1 Ports 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Archer Ge800 wins this comparison with a score of 60/100, ahead of Archer Ge650 (54).
The main differences: Wi-Fi speed (11000 Mb/s vs 11528 Mb/s) · External antennas (3 vs 8) · LAN ports (5 vs 7).
Scores are computed from 3 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Archer Ge800 if you care about…
- Wi-Fi speed 11528 Mb/s +528 Mb/s vs 11000 Mb/s
- External antennas 8 +5 vs 3
- LAN ports 7 +2 vs 5
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
ASUS RT-BE88U
Amazon Eero Pro 6
ASUS Asus TUF Gaming BE3600
ASUS Asus TUF Gaming AX4200
ASUS Asus TUF Gaming AX3000 V2
ASUS Asus RT-BE82U
Where they differ
3 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Archer Ge650 | Archer Ge800 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wi-Fi speed | 11000 Mb/s | 11528 Mb/s | Archer Ge800 |
| External antennas | 3 | 8 | Archer Ge800 |
| LAN ports | 5 | 7 | Archer Ge800 |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Wireless1▾
| Archer Ge650 | Archer Ge800 | |
|---|---|---|
| Wi-Fi speed | 11000 Mb/s | 11528 Mb/s |
Hardware1▾
| Archer Ge650 | Archer Ge800 | |
|---|---|---|
| External antennas | 3 | 8 |
Ports1▾
| Archer Ge650 | Archer Ge800 | |
|---|---|---|
| LAN ports | 5 | 7 |
Data sources: Amazon
FAQ
Which is better, Archer Ge650 or Archer Ge800?
Archer Ge800 has the higher overall score (60 vs 54) and leads in Wireless, Hardware, Ports.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Wi-Fi speed (11000 Mb/s vs 11528 Mb/s) · External antennas (3 vs 8) · LAN ports (5 vs 7).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 3 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.