EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

WI University of Wisconsin-Madison vs WI University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

🏆 Settled

WI University of Wisconsin-Madison — Pick the WI University of Wisconsin-Madison — it leads these groups: Cost & outcomes 4 Admissions 2 Students & campus 1

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

WI University of Wisconsin-Madison wins this comparison with a score of 53/100, ahead of WI University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (42).

The main differences: Acceptance rate (45.2 % vs 90.7 %) · Average SAT (1427 vs 1090) · Average ACT (29 vs 22).

Scores are computed from 16 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

🏆 Overall winner

WI University of Wisconsin-Madison

WI
53score / 100
7 wins · 7 tied

WI University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

WI
42score / 100
3 wins · 11 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

WI University of Wisconsin-MadisonWI University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Admissions 62 50
Cost & outcomes 60 50
Rankings 55 48
Students & campus 23 10

How to choose

Pick the WI University of Wisconsin-Madison if you care about…

  • Average SAT 1427 +337 vs 1090
  • Average ACT 29 +7 vs 22
  • Median earnings (10 yr) 73792 USD +18802 USD vs 54990 USD
  • Earnings >$50k (10 yr) 85.8 % +9.2 % vs 76.6 %

Pick the WI University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee if you care about…

  • Acceptance rate 90.7 % +45.5 % vs 45.2 %
  • In-state tuition 10398 USD/yr +1205 USD/yr vs 11603 USD/yr
  • Out-of-state tuition 22398 USD/yr +19705 USD/yr vs 42103 USD/yr

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

10 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

WI University of Wisconsin-MadisonWI University of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeWhere they differ
Acceptance rate 45.2 %90.7 % WI University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Average SAT 14271090 WI University of Wisconsin-Madison
Average ACT 2922 WI University of Wisconsin-Madison
In-state tuition 11603 USD/yr10398 USD/yr WI University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Out-of-state tuition 42103 USD/yr22398 USD/yr WI University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Median earnings (10 yr) 73792 USD54990 USD WI University of Wisconsin-Madison
Earnings >$50k (10 yr) 85.8 %76.6 % WI University of Wisconsin-Madison
Graduation rate (150%) 89.5 %49.3 % WI University of Wisconsin-Madison
Freshman retention 96.2 %73.0 % WI University of Wisconsin-Madison
Undergraduate students 3690216758 WI University of Wisconsin-Madison

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Admissions3▾
WI University of Wisconsin-MadisonWI University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Acceptance rate 45.2 % 90.7 %
Average SAT 1427 1090
Average ACT 29 22
Cost & outcomes6▾
WI University of Wisconsin-MadisonWI University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
In-state tuition 11603 USD/yr 10398 USD/yr
Out-of-state tuition 42103 USD/yr 22398 USD/yr
Median earnings (10 yr) 73792 USD 54990 USD
Earnings >$50k (10 yr) 85.8 % 76.6 %
Graduation rate (150%) 89.5 % 49.3 %
Freshman retention 96.2 % 73.0 %
Rankings4▾
WI University of Wisconsin-MadisonWI University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
THE world rank 53 —
THE overall score 75 —
THE teaching 70.3 —
THE research 68.8 —
Students & campus3▾
WI University of Wisconsin-MadisonWI University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Undergraduate students 36902 16758
Campus setting City City
Ownership Public Public

Data sources: College Scorecard · Times Higher Education

FAQ

Which is better, WI University of Wisconsin-Madison or WI University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee?

WI University of Wisconsin-Madison has the higher overall score (53 vs 42) and leads in Cost & outcomes, Admissions, Students & campus. Choose WI University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee instead if Acceptance rate matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Acceptance rate (45.2 % vs 90.7 %) · Average SAT (1427 vs 1090) · Average ACT (29 vs 22).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 16 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.