EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

Vivo vivo iQOO 16 vs Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra

🏆 Settled

Vivo vivo iQOO 16 — Pick the Vivo vivo iQOO 16 — it leads these groups: Display 3 Camera 1

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

Vivo vivo iQOO 16 wins this comparison with a score of 44/100, ahead of Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra (37).

The main differences: Peak brightness (10000 nits vs 4500 nits) · Refresh rate (165 Hz vs 144 Hz) · Pixel density (508 ppi vs 514 ppi).

Scores are computed from 25 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

🏆 Overall winner Vivo vivo iQOO 16

Vivo vivo iQOO 16

Vivo
44score / 100
7 wins · 14 tied
Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra

Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra

Vivo
37score / 100
4 wins · 17 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Vivo vivo iQOO 16Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra
Display 61 42
Battery 62 44
Performance 55 55
Camera 34 22
Design 67 66
Platform 9 9
Features 50 50

How to choose

Pick the Vivo vivo iQOO 16 if you care about…

  • Screen size 6.8 in +0.0 in vs 6.8 in
  • Peak brightness 10000 nits +5500 nits vs 4500 nits
  • Refresh rate 165 Hz +21 Hz vs 144 Hz
  • Wireless charging ✓ vs —

Pick the Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra if you care about…

  • Pixel density 514 ppi +6 ppi vs 508 ppi
  • Battery capacity 9100 mAh +700 mAh vs 8400 mAh
  • Length 163.4 mm +0.4 mm vs 163.8 mm
  • Width 75.9 mm +1 mm vs 76.9 mm

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

13 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

Vivo vivo iQOO 16Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 UltraWhere they differ
Peak brightness 10000 nits4500 nits Vivo vivo iQOO 16
Refresh rate 165 Hz144 Hz Vivo vivo iQOO 16
Pixel density 508 ppi514 ppi Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra
Battery capacity 8400 mAh9100 mAh Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra
Wireless charging ✓— Vivo vivo iQOO 16
Chipset Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6Dimensity 9500M Depends
OS Android 17Android 16 Depends
Selfie camera 32 MP16 MP Vivo vivo iQOO 16
Weight 229.8 g230 g Vivo vivo iQOO 16
Thickness 8.3 mm8.6 mm Vivo vivo iQOO 16
Length 163.8 mm163.4 mm Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra
Width 76.9 mm75.9 mm Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra
Colors Dark Blue, Silver, Chasing the LightBlack, White, Blue Depends

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Display5▾
Vivo vivo iQOO 16Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra
Screen size 6.8 in 6.8 in
Peak brightness 10000 nits 4500 nits
Refresh rate 165 Hz 144 Hz
Pixel density 508 ppi 514 ppi
Display type AMOLED AMOLED
Battery4▾
Vivo vivo iQOO 16Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra
Battery capacity 8400 mAh 9100 mAh
Wired charging 100 W 100 W
Wireless charging power 40 W —
Wireless charging ✓ —
Performance4▾
Vivo vivo iQOO 16Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra
RAM 12 GB 12 GB
Chipset Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 Dimensity 9500M
OS Android 17 Android 16
Storage 256 GB 256 GB
Camera2▾
Vivo vivo iQOO 16Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Selfie camera 32 MP 16 MP
Design6▾
Vivo vivo iQOO 16Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra
Weight 229.8 g 230 g
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.6 mm
Water resistant (IP68) ✓ ✓
Length 163.8 mm 163.4 mm
Width 76.9 mm 75.9 mm
Colors Dark Blue, Silver, Chasing the Light Black, White, Blue
Memory1▾
Vivo vivo iQOO 16Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra
Memory card slot — —
Platform1▾
Vivo vivo iQOO 16Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra
CPU cores 8 8
Features2▾
Vivo vivo iQOO 16Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra
Face unlock — —
Fingerprint sensor ✓ ✓

Data sources: GSMArena

FAQ

Which is better, Vivo vivo iQOO 16 or Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra?

Vivo vivo iQOO 16 has the higher overall score (44 vs 37) and leads in Display, Camera. Choose Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra instead if Pixel density matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Peak brightness (10000 nits vs 4500 nits) · Refresh rate (165 Hz vs 144 Hz) · Pixel density (508 ppi vs 514 ppi).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 25 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.