EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra vs Vivo vivo IQOO Pad5c

🏆 Settled

Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra — Pick the Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra — it leads these groups: Display 3 Performance 2 Camera 2

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra wins this comparison with a score of 64/100, ahead of Vivo vivo IQOO Pad5c (40).

The main differences: Screen size (8.8 in vs 12.1 in) · Peak brightness (4500 nits vs 900 nits) · Refresh rate (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).

Scores are computed from 14 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

🏆 Overall winner Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra

Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra

Vivo
64score / 100
10 wins · 2 tied
Vivo vivo IQOO Pad5c

Vivo vivo IQOO Pad5c

Vivo
40score / 100
2 wins · 10 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Vivo vivo iQOO Pad UltraVivo vivo IQOO Pad5c
Display 67 48
Battery 50 48
Performance 83 40
Camera 19 8
Design 94 50

How to choose

Pick the Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra if you care about…

  • Peak brightness 4500 nits +3600 nits vs 900 nits
  • Refresh rate 165 Hz +21 Hz vs 144 Hz
  • Pixel density 309 ppi +26 ppi vs 283 ppi
  • Wired charging 66 W +22 W vs 44 W

Pick the Vivo vivo IQOO Pad5c if you care about…

  • Screen size 12.1 in +3.3 in vs 8.8 in
  • Battery capacity 10000 mAh +980 mAh vs 9020 mAh

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

14 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

Vivo vivo iQOO Pad UltraVivo vivo IQOO Pad5cWhere they differ
Screen size 8.8 in12.1 in Vivo vivo IQOO Pad5c
Peak brightness 4500 nits900 nits Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra
Refresh rate 165 Hz144 Hz Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra
Pixel density 309 ppi283 ppi Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra
Battery capacity 9020 mAh10000 mAh Vivo vivo IQOO Pad5c
Wired charging 66 W44 W Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra
RAM 12 GB8 GB Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra
Storage 256 GB128 GB Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra
Chipset Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Depends
OS Android 17Android 16 Depends
Main camera 13 MP8 MP Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra
Selfie camera 8 MP5 MP Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra
Weight 298 g584 g Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra
Thickness 5.7 mm6.6 mm Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Display4▾
Vivo vivo iQOO Pad UltraVivo vivo IQOO Pad5c
Screen size 8.8 in 12.1 in
Peak brightness 4500 nits 900 nits
Refresh rate 165 Hz 144 Hz
Pixel density 309 ppi 283 ppi
Battery2▾
Vivo vivo iQOO Pad UltraVivo vivo IQOO Pad5c
Battery capacity 9020 mAh 10000 mAh
Wired charging 66 W 44 W
Performance4▾
Vivo vivo iQOO Pad UltraVivo vivo IQOO Pad5c
RAM 12 GB 8 GB
Storage 256 GB 128 GB
Chipset Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
OS Android 17 Android 16
Camera2▾
Vivo vivo iQOO Pad UltraVivo vivo IQOO Pad5c
Main camera 13 MP 8 MP
Selfie camera 8 MP 5 MP
Design2▾
Vivo vivo iQOO Pad UltraVivo vivo IQOO Pad5c
Weight 298 g 584 g
Thickness 5.7 mm 6.6 mm

Data sources: GSMArena

FAQ

Which is better, Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra or Vivo vivo IQOO Pad5c?

Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra has the higher overall score (64 vs 40) and leads in Display, Performance, Camera. Choose Vivo vivo IQOO Pad5c instead if Screen size matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Screen size (8.8 in vs 12.1 in) · Peak brightness (4500 nits vs 900 nits) · Refresh rate (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 14 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.