AOC Q27G3S vs AOC Q27G4
The short answer
AOC Q27G4 wins this comparison with a score of 61/100, ahead of AOC Q27G3S (58).
The main differences: Resolution (2560x1440 vs 2560 x 1440 px) · Weight (with stand) (4700 g vs 4870 g).
Scores are computed from 10 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| AOC Q27G3S | AOC Q27G4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 41 | 50 |
| Connectivity | 29 | 29 |
| Ergonomics | 88 | 87 |
How to choose
Pick the AOC Q27G3S if you care about…
- Weight (with stand) 4700 g +170 g vs 4870 g
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
BENQ EW3270U
SAMSUNG Odyssey G7 32
SAMSUNG Odyssey G5 27
Where they differ
2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| AOC Q27G3S | AOC Q27G4 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2560x1440 | 2560 x 1440 px | Depends |
| Weight (with stand) | 4700 g | 4870 g | AOC Q27G3S |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display6▾
| AOC Q27G3S | AOC Q27G4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 27 in | 27 in |
| Resolution | 2560x1440 | 2560 x 1440 px |
| Max refresh rate | — | 180 Hz |
| Response time | — | 1 ms |
| Brightness | — | 350 cd/m² |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
Connectivity1▾
| AOC Q27G3S | AOC Q27G4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Built-in speakers | — | — |
Ergonomics3▾
| AOC Q27G3S | AOC Q27G4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Height adjustment | — | ✓ |
| VESA mounting | — | ✓ |
| Weight (with stand) | 4700 g | 4870 g |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, AOC Q27G3S or AOC Q27G4?
AOC Q27G4 has the higher overall score (61 vs 58). Choose AOC Q27G3S instead if Weight (with stand) matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Resolution (2560x1440 vs 2560 x 1440 px) · Weight (with stand) (4700 g vs 4870 g).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 10 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.