Dell SK-8120 vs Ducky One 3 SF
The short answer
Ducky One 3 SF wins this comparison with a score of 66/100, ahead of Dell SK-8120 (56).
The main differences: Layout (全尺寸式 vs ANSI (United States)) · Key count (104 vs 68) · Switch type (火山口架构 vs Cherry MX Red).
Scores are computed from 10 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Dell SK-8120 if you care about…
- Key count 104 +36 vs 68
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Logitech MX Keys S
Razer BlackWidow V4 Pro
Aula F99
MCHOSE G75 Pro
Lofree -68
B.FRIENDit K23
Where they differ
3 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Dell SK-8120 | Ducky One 3 SF | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Layout | 全尺寸式 | ANSI (United States) | Depends |
| Key count | 104 | 68 | Dell SK-8120 |
| Switch type | 火山口架构 | Cherry MX Red | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Design5▾
| Dell SK-8120 | Ducky One 3 SF | |
|---|---|---|
| Layout | 全尺寸式 | ANSI (United States) |
| Hot-swappable | — | ✓ |
| Per-key RGB | — | ✓ |
| Key count | 104 | 68 |
| Weight | — | 627 g |
Connect3▾
| Dell SK-8120 | Ducky One 3 SF | |
|---|---|---|
| Wired | — | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | — | — |
| 2.4GHz wireless | — | — |
Feel1▾
| Dell SK-8120 | Ducky One 3 SF | |
|---|---|---|
| Switch type | 火山口架构 | Cherry MX Red |
Value1▾
| Dell SK-8120 | Ducky One 3 SF | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | — | 120 USD |
Data sources: ZOL
FAQ
Which is better, Dell SK-8120 or Ducky One 3 SF?
Ducky One 3 SF has the higher overall score (66 vs 56). Choose Dell SK-8120 instead if Key count matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Layout (全尺寸式 vs ANSI (United States)) · Key count (104 vs 68) · Switch type (火山口架构 vs Cherry MX Red).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 10 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.