EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

DJI Mavic 4 Pro vs DJI Mavic Pro

🏆 Settled

DJI Mavic Pro — Pick the DJI Mavic Pro — it leads these groups: Design 1

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

DJI Mavic Pro wins this comparison with a score of 80/100, ahead of DJI Mavic 4 Pro (79).

The main differences: Weight (1063 g vs 743 g) · Max video (6K60 HDR vs 4K, 6K).

Scores are computed from 7 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

DJI Mavic 4 Pro

DJI Mavic 4 Pro

DJI
79score / 100
0 wins · 6 tied
🏆 Overall winner DJI Mavic Pro

DJI Mavic Pro

DJI
80score / 100
1 win · 5 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

DJI Mavic 4 ProDJI Mavic Pro
Design 79 86
Flight 100 67
Camera 100 100
Value 0 62

How to choose

Pick the DJI Mavic Pro if you care about…

  • Weight 743 g +320 g vs 1063 g

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

DJI Mavic 4 ProDJI Mavic ProWhere they differ
Weight 1063 g743 g DJI Mavic Pro
Max video 6K60 HDR4K, 6K Depends

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Design1▾
DJI Mavic 4 ProDJI Mavic Pro
Weight 1063 g 743 g
Flight3▾
DJI Mavic 4 ProDJI Mavic Pro
Max flight time 51 min —
Omnidirectional obstacle sensing ✓ —
Transmission range 30 km —
Camera2▾
DJI Mavic 4 ProDJI Mavic Pro
Camera resolution 100 MP 100 MP
Max video 6K60 HDR 4K, 6K
Value1▾
DJI Mavic 4 ProDJI Mavic Pro
Price 1999 USD —

Data sources: Amazon

FAQ

Which is better, DJI Mavic 4 Pro or DJI Mavic Pro?

DJI Mavic Pro edges ahead 80 to 79 and leads in Design.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Weight (1063 g vs 743 g) · Max video (6K60 HDR vs 4K, 6K).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 7 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.