EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

EPOMAKER Galaxy100 Lite vs EPOMAKER Galaxy100 QMK/VIA

The short answer

EPOMAKER Galaxy100 QMK/VIA wins this comparison with a score of 68/100, ahead of EPOMAKER Galaxy100 Lite (66).

The main differences: Layout (ANSI (United States) vs QWERTY) · Switch type (Feker Marble White Switch vs Linear).

Scores are computed from 7 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

EPOMAKER Galaxy100 Lite

EPOMAKER Galaxy100 Lite

Epomaker
66score / 100
0 wins · 5 tied
🏆 Overall winner EPOMAKER Galaxy100 QMK/VIA

EPOMAKER Galaxy100 QMK/VIA

Epomaker
68score / 100
0 wins · 5 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

EPOMAKER Galaxy100 LiteEPOMAKER Galaxy100 QMK/VIA
Design 81 89
Connect 66 66

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

EPOMAKER Galaxy100 LiteEPOMAKER Galaxy100 QMK/VIAWhere they differ
Layout ANSI (United States)QWERTY Depends
Switch type Feker Marble White SwitchLinear Depends

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Design5▾
EPOMAKER Galaxy100 LiteEPOMAKER Galaxy100 QMK/VIA
Layout ANSI (United States) QWERTY
Hot-swappable ✓ ✓
Per-key RGB ✓ ✓
Key count — 101
Weight 1660 g —
Connect1▾
EPOMAKER Galaxy100 LiteEPOMAKER Galaxy100 QMK/VIA
Wired — ✓
Feel1▾
EPOMAKER Galaxy100 LiteEPOMAKER Galaxy100 QMK/VIA
Switch type Feker Marble White Switch Linear

Data sources: Amazon

FAQ

Which is better, EPOMAKER Galaxy100 Lite or EPOMAKER Galaxy100 QMK/VIA?

EPOMAKER Galaxy100 QMK/VIA edges ahead 68 to 66.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Layout (ANSI (United States) vs QWERTY) · Switch type (Feker Marble White Switch vs Linear).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 7 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.