HKC MG27Q vs HKC S2716Q
The short answer
HKC S2716Q wins this comparison with a score of 63/100, ahead of HKC MG27Q (61).
The main differences: Max refresh rate (165 Hz vs 60 Hz) · Panel type (Nano-IPS vs IPS).
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| HKC MG27Q | HKC S2716Q | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 42 | 46 |
| Ergonomics | 86 | 86 |
How to choose
Pick the HKC MG27Q if you care about…
- Max refresh rate 165 Hz +105 Hz vs 60 Hz
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| HKC MG27Q | HKC S2716Q | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max refresh rate | 165 Hz | 60 Hz | HKC MG27Q |
| Panel type | Nano-IPS | IPS | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display4▾
| HKC MG27Q | HKC S2716Q | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 27 in | 27 in |
| Resolution | 2560x1440 | 2560x1440 |
| Max refresh rate | 165 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Panel type | Nano-IPS | IPS |
Ergonomics1▾
| HKC MG27Q | HKC S2716Q | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | — | 4200 g |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, HKC MG27Q or HKC S2716Q?
HKC S2716Q edges ahead 63 to 61. Choose HKC MG27Q instead if Max refresh rate matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Max refresh rate (165 Hz vs 60 Hz) · Panel type (Nano-IPS vs IPS).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.
GIGABYTE M27Q
MSI Optix MAG274QRF
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
LG UltraFine 27UL500
BENQ EW3270U