EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

HKC MG27Q vs HKC S2716Q

The short answer

HKC S2716Q wins this comparison with a score of 63/100, ahead of HKC MG27Q (61).

The main differences: Max refresh rate (165 Hz vs 60 Hz) · Panel type (Nano-IPS vs IPS).

Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

HKC MG27Q

HKC MG27Q

HKC
61score / 100
1 win · 2 tied ZOL Users ★ 4.9 (1131)
🏆 Overall winner HKC S2716Q

HKC S2716Q

HKC
63score / 100
0 wins · 3 tied ZOL Users ★ 5.0 (1119)

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

HKC MG27QHKC S2716Q
Display 42 46
Ergonomics 86 86

How to choose

Pick the HKC MG27Q if you care about…

  • Max refresh rate 165 Hz +105 Hz vs 60 Hz

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

HKC MG27QHKC S2716QWhere they differ
Max refresh rate 165 Hz60 Hz HKC MG27Q
Panel type Nano-IPSIPS Depends

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Display4▾
HKC MG27QHKC S2716Q
Screen size 27 in 27 in
Resolution 2560x1440 2560x1440
Max refresh rate 165 Hz 60 Hz
Panel type Nano-IPS IPS
Ergonomics1▾
HKC MG27QHKC S2716Q
Weight (with stand) — 4200 g

Data sources: GSMArena

FAQ

Which is better, HKC MG27Q or HKC S2716Q?

HKC S2716Q edges ahead 63 to 61. Choose HKC MG27Q instead if Max refresh rate matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Max refresh rate (165 Hz vs 60 Hz) · Panel type (Nano-IPS vs IPS).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.