JBL Live 670NC vs JBL Live 680NC
JBL Live 680NC — Pick the JBL Live 680NC — it leads these groups: Battery 2 Audio 2 Connectivity 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
JBL Live 680NC wins this comparison with a score of 72/100, ahead of JBL Live 670NC (62).
The main differences: Weight (219 g vs 231.2 g) · Battery life (65 h vs 80 h) · Charge time (3 h vs 2 h).
Scores are computed from 15 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| JBL Live 670NC | JBL Live 680NC | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | 60 | 59 |
| Features | 100 | 100 |
| Battery | 40 | 56 |
| Audio | 36 | 54 |
| Connectivity | 84 | 98 |
How to choose
Pick the JBL Live 670NC if you care about…
- Weight 219 g +12.2 g vs 231.2 g
Pick the JBL Live 680NC if you care about…
- Battery life 80 h +15 h vs 65 h
- Charge time 2 h +1 h vs 3 h
- Lowest frequency 10 Hz +10 Hz vs 20 Hz
- Highest frequency 40000 Hz +20000 Hz vs 20000 Hz
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Sony WH-1000XM6
Sony WH-1000XM5
Sony WH-1000XM4
Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless
JBL Live 770NC
JBL Tour One M2
Where they differ
6 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| JBL Live 670NC | JBL Live 680NC | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | 219 g | 231.2 g | JBL Live 670NC |
| Battery life | 65 h | 80 h | JBL Live 680NC |
| Charge time | 3 h | 2 h | JBL Live 680NC |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 10 Hz | JBL Live 680NC |
| Highest frequency | 20000 Hz | 40000 Hz | JBL Live 680NC |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 6 | JBL Live 680NC |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Design3▾
| JBL Live 670NC | JBL Live 680NC | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 219 g | 231.2 g |
| Sweat/water resistance | — | — |
| Foldable design | ✓ | ✓ |
Features2▾
| JBL Live 670NC | JBL Live 680NC | |
|---|---|---|
| Active noise cancellation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Built-in microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
Battery2▾
| JBL Live 670NC | JBL Live 680NC | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 65 h | 80 h |
| Charge time | 3 h | 2 h |
Audio5▾
| JBL Live 670NC | JBL Live 680NC | |
|---|---|---|
| Driver unit | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 10 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20000 Hz | 40000 Hz |
| LDAC | — | — |
Connectivity3▾
| JBL Live 670NC | JBL Live 680NC | |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 6 |
| Multipoint connection | ✓ | — |
| USB-C charging | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, JBL Live 670NC or JBL Live 680NC?
JBL Live 680NC has the higher overall score (72 vs 62) and leads in Battery, Audio, Connectivity. Choose JBL Live 670NC instead if Weight matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Weight (219 g vs 231.2 g) · Battery life (65 h vs 80 h) · Charge time (3 h vs 2 h).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 15 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.