EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

JBL WIND3 vs Microlab M-200

The short answer

Microlab M-200 wins this comparison with a score of 65/100, ahead of JBL WIND3 (36).

Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

JBL WIND3

JBL WIND3

JBL
36score / 100
0 wins · 5 tied
🏆 Overall winner Microlab M-200

Microlab M-200

Microlab
65score / 100
0 wins · 5 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

JBL WIND3Microlab M-200
Battery 0 41
Design 100 97
Audio 0 1
Connectivity 67 87
Features 0 100

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Battery1▾
JBL WIND3Microlab M-200
Battery life 5 h —
Design1▾
JBL WIND3Microlab M-200
Weight 230 g —
Audio1▾
JBL WIND3Microlab M-200
Output power 1 W —
Connectivity1▾
JBL WIND3Microlab M-200
Bluetooth version 5 —
Features1▾
JBL WIND3Microlab M-200
Stereo pairing — —

FAQ

Which is better, JBL WIND3 or Microlab M-200?

Microlab M-200 has the higher overall score (65 vs 36).

What are the main differences?

Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.