Philips 27E2F7901 vs Philips 27E2N1100
The short answer
Philips 27E2F7901 wins this comparison with a score of 61.4/100, ahead of Philips 27E2N1100 (60.8).
The main differences: Resolution (3840x2160 vs 1920x1080) · Max refresh rate (60 Hz vs 100 Hz).
Scores are computed from 4 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Philips 27E2F7901 | Philips 27E2N1100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 42 | 40 |
How to choose
Pick the Philips 27E2N1100 if you care about…
- Max refresh rate 100 Hz +40 Hz vs 60 Hz
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
MSI Optix MAG274QRF
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
LG UltraFine 27UL500
BENQ EW3270U
Where they differ
2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Philips 27E2F7901 | Philips 27E2N1100 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 | Depends |
| Max refresh rate | 60 Hz | 100 Hz | Philips 27E2N1100 |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display4▾
| Philips 27E2F7901 | Philips 27E2N1100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 27 in | 27 in |
| Resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Max refresh rate | 60 Hz | 100 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Philips 27E2F7901 or Philips 27E2N1100?
Philips 27E2F7901 edges ahead 61 to 61. Choose Philips 27E2N1100 instead if Max refresh rate matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Resolution (3840x2160 vs 1920x1080) · Max refresh rate (60 Hz vs 100 Hz).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 4 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.