Samsung S27FG812SC vs Samsung S27FG902XC
Samsung S27FG812SC — Pick the Samsung S27FG812SC — it leads these groups: Display 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Samsung S27FG812SC wins this comparison with a score of 62/100, ahead of Samsung S27FG902XC (61).
The main differences: Max refresh rate (240 Hz vs 165 Hz) · Panel type (OLED vs IPS).
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Samsung S27FG812SC | Samsung S27FG902XC | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 44 | 42 |
| Ergonomics | 86 | 86 |
How to choose
Pick the Samsung S27FG812SC if you care about…
- Max refresh rate 240 Hz +75 Hz vs 165 Hz
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
MSI Optix MAG274QRF
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
LG UltraFine 27UL500
BENQ EW3270U
Where they differ
2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Samsung S27FG812SC | Samsung S27FG902XC | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max refresh rate | 240 Hz | 165 Hz | Samsung S27FG812SC |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display4▾
| Samsung S27FG812SC | Samsung S27FG902XC | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 27 in | 27 in |
| Resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Max refresh rate | 240 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS |
Ergonomics1▾
| Samsung S27FG812SC | Samsung S27FG902XC | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | — | 4700 g |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Samsung S27FG812SC or Samsung S27FG902XC?
Samsung S27FG812SC edges ahead 62 to 61 and leads in Display.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Max refresh rate (240 Hz vs 165 Hz) · Panel type (OLED vs IPS).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.