Sharp Aquos R8s vs Sharp Aquos R8s pro
Sharp Aquos R8s pro — Pick the Sharp Aquos R8s pro — it leads these groups: Display 3 Battery 2 Performance 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Sharp Aquos R8s pro wins this comparison with a score of 42/100, ahead of Sharp Aquos R8s (39).
The main differences: Screen size (6.4 in vs 6.6 in) · Peak brightness (1300 nits vs 2000 nits) · Pixel density (403 ppi vs 456 ppi).
Scores are computed from 24 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Sharp Aquos R8s if you care about…
- Main camera 50 MP +2.8 MP vs 47.2 MP
- Weight 179 g +24 g vs 203 g
- Thickness 8.7 mm +0.6 mm vs 9.3 mm
- Length 159 mm +2 mm vs 161 mm
Pick the Sharp Aquos R8s pro if you care about…
- Screen size 6.6 in +0.2 in vs 6.4 in
- Peak brightness 2000 nits +700 nits vs 1300 nits
- Pixel density 456 ppi +53 ppi vs 403 ppi
- Battery capacity 5000 mAh +250 mAh vs 4750 mAh
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Where they differ
13 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Sharp Aquos R8s | Sharp Aquos R8s pro | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.4 in | 6.6 in | Sharp Aquos R8s pro |
| Peak brightness | 1300 nits | 2000 nits | Sharp Aquos R8s pro |
| Pixel density | 403 ppi | 456 ppi | Sharp Aquos R8s pro |
| Battery capacity | 4750 mAh | 5000 mAh | Sharp Aquos R8s pro |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 27 W | Sharp Aquos R8s pro |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB | Sharp Aquos R8s pro |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 47.2 MP | Sharp Aquos R8s |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 12.6 MP | Sharp Aquos R8s pro |
| Weight | 179 g | 203 g | Sharp Aquos R8s |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 9.3 mm | Sharp Aquos R8s |
| Length | 159 mm | 161 mm | Sharp Aquos R8s |
| Width | 74 mm | 77 mm | Sharp Aquos R8s |
| Colors | Blue, White | Black | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Sharp Aquos R8s | Sharp Aquos R8s pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.4 in | 6.6 in |
| Peak brightness | 1300 nits | 2000 nits |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Pixel density | 403 ppi | 456 ppi |
| Display type | PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | PRO IGZO LTPO OLED |
Battery3▾
| Sharp Aquos R8s | Sharp Aquos R8s pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 4750 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 27 W |
| Wireless charging | — | — |
Performance4▾
| Sharp Aquos R8s | Sharp Aquos R8s pro | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
Camera2▾
| Sharp Aquos R8s | Sharp Aquos R8s pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 47.2 MP |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 12.6 MP |
Design6▾
| Sharp Aquos R8s | Sharp Aquos R8s pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 179 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 9.3 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Length | 159 mm | 161 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 77 mm |
| Colors | Blue, White | Black |
Memory1▾
| Sharp Aquos R8s | Sharp Aquos R8s pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | ✓ | ✓ |
Platform1▾
| Sharp Aquos R8s | Sharp Aquos R8s pro | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Features2▾
| Sharp Aquos R8s | Sharp Aquos R8s pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Sharp Aquos R8s or Sharp Aquos R8s pro?
Sharp Aquos R8s pro has the higher overall score (42 vs 39) and leads in Display, Battery, Performance. Choose Sharp Aquos R8s instead if Main camera matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (6.4 in vs 6.6 in) · Peak brightness (1300 nits vs 2000 nits) · Pixel density (403 ppi vs 456 ppi).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 24 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.