EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

Balance 2 vs Balance 3

🏆 Settled

Balance 3 — Pick the Balance 3 — it leads these groups: Memory 1

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

Balance 3 wins this comparison with a score of 68/100, ahead of Balance 2 (63).

The main differences: Weight (43 g vs 62 g) · Storage (32 GB vs 64 GB).

Scores are computed from 9 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

Balance 2

Balance 2

Amazfit
63score / 100
1 win · 8 tied
🏆 Overall winner Balance 3

Balance 3

Amazfit
68score / 100
1 win · 8 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Balance 2Balance 3
Display 37 37
Battery 47 47
Design 85 69
Connectivity 100 100
Memory 50 100

How to choose

Pick the Balance 2 if you care about…

  • Weight 43 g +19 g vs 62 g

Pick the Balance 3 if you care about…

  • Storage 64 GB +32 GB vs 32 GB

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

Balance 2Balance 3Where they differ
Weight 43 g62 g Balance 2
Storage 32 GB64 GB Balance 3

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Display2▾
Balance 2Balance 3
Screen size 1.5 in 1.5 in
Pixel density 323 ppi 323 ppi
Battery2▾
Balance 2Balance 3
Battery capacity 658 mAh 658 mAh
Battery endurance rating 21 hours 21 hours
Design2▾
Balance 2Balance 3
Water resistance ✓ —
Weight 43 g 62 g
Connectivity2▾
Balance 2Balance 3
NFC ✓ ✓
GPS ✓ ✓
Memory1▾
Balance 2Balance 3
Storage 32 GB 64 GB

FAQ

Which is better, Balance 2 or Balance 3?

Balance 3 has the higher overall score (68 vs 63) and leads in Memory. Choose Balance 2 instead if Weight matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Weight (43 g vs 62 g) · Storage (32 GB vs 64 GB).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 9 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.