Canon EOS R6 Mark III vs Canon EOS R6 V
Canon EOS R6 V — Pick the Canon EOS R6 V — it leads these groups: Design 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Canon EOS R6 V wins this comparison with a score of 65.8/100, ahead of Canon EOS R6 Mark III (65.5).
The main differences: Max video (Recording format:MP4, RAW Video format:XF-HEVC S/H.265, XF-AVC S/H.264 Color sampling:YCbCr 4:2:0/8, YCbCr 4:2:0/10, YCbCr 4:2:2/10 CP: C1: Canon 709 / C2: Canon Log 2 / C3: Canon Log 3 / C4: PQ / C5: HLG / C6: BT.709 Standard / C7～C20: : BT.709, BT.2020, Cinema Gamut : PCM 24 bit RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S; AAC 16 bit XF-HEVC S / XF-AVC S; PCM 16 bit HDMI RAW : : RAW6960×4640, MP46912×4608, MP4 Proxy1920×1280; : RAW6960×3672, 4K DCI4096×2160, 4K UHD3840×2160, 2K DCI2048×1080, FHD1920×1080 : NTSC: 179.8P/119.9P/59.94P/29.97P/24P/23.98P; PAL: 150P/100P/50P/25P/24P vs 7K) · Body weight (609 g vs 598 g).
Scores are computed from 4 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Canon EOS R6 V if you care about…
- Body weight 598 g +11 g vs 609 g
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Sony ZV-E1
Fujifilm X-T5
Nikon Z6III
Sony A7C II
Sony A7 IV
Canon EOS R50
Where they differ
2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Canon EOS R6 Mark III | Canon EOS R6 V | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max video | Recording format:MP4, RAW Video format:XF-HEVC S/H.265, XF-AVC S/H.264 Color sampling:YCbCr 4:2:0/8, YCbCr 4:2:0/10, YCbCr 4:2:2/10 CP: C1: Canon 709 / C2: Canon Log 2 / C3: Canon Log 3 / C4: PQ / C5: HLG / C6: BT.709 Standard / C7～C20: : BT.709, BT.2020, Cinema Gamut : PCM 24 bit RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S; AAC 16 bit XF-HEVC S / XF-AVC S; PCM 16 bit HDMI RAW : : RAW6960×4640, MP46912×4608, MP4 Proxy1920×1280; : RAW6960×3672, 4K DCI4096×2160, 4K UHD3840×2160, 2K DCI2048×1080, FHD1920×1080 : NTSC: 179.8P/119.9P/59.94P/29.97P/24P/23.98P; PAL: 150P/100P/50P/25P/24P | 7K | Depends |
| Body weight | 609 g | 598 g | Canon EOS R6 V |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Sensor1▾
| Canon EOS R6 Mark III | Canon EOS R6 V | |
|---|---|---|
| In-body stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
Video1▾
| Canon EOS R6 Mark III | Canon EOS R6 V | |
|---|---|---|
| Max video | Recording format:MP4, RAW Video format:XF-HEVC S/H.265, XF-AVC S/H.264 Color sampling:YCbCr 4:2:0/8, YCbCr 4:2:0/10, YCbCr 4:2:2/10 CP: C1: Canon 709 / C2: Canon Log 2 / C3: Canon Log 3 / C4: PQ / C5: HLG / C6: BT.709 Standard / C7～C20: : BT.709, BT.2020, Cinema Gamut : PCM 24 bit RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S; AAC 16 bit XF-HEVC S / XF-AVC S; PCM 16 bit HDMI RAW : : RAW6960×4640, MP46912×4608, MP4 Proxy1920×1280; : RAW6960×3672, 4K DCI4096×2160, 4K UHD3840×2160, 2K DCI2048×1080, FHD1920×1080 : NTSC: 179.8P/119.9P/59.94P/29.97P/24P/23.98P; PAL: 150P/100P/50P/25P/24P | 7K |
Speed1▾
| Canon EOS R6 Mark III | Canon EOS R6 V | |
|---|---|---|
| Max burst FPS | 40 fps | 40 fps |
Design1▾
| Canon EOS R6 Mark III | Canon EOS R6 V | |
|---|---|---|
| Body weight | 609 g | 598 g |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Canon EOS R6 Mark III or Canon EOS R6 V?
Canon EOS R6 V edges ahead 66 to 66 and leads in Design.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Max video (Recording format:MP4, RAW Video format:XF-HEVC S/H.265, XF-AVC S/H.264 Color sampling:YCbCr 4:2:0/8, YCbCr 4:2:0/10, YCbCr 4:2:2/10 CP: C1: Canon 709 / C2: Canon Log 2 / C3: Canon Log 3 / C4: PQ / C5: HLG / C6: BT.709 Standard / C7～C20: : BT.709, BT.2020, Cinema Gamut : PCM 24 bit RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S; AAC 16 bit XF-HEVC S / XF-AVC S; PCM 16 bit HDMI RAW : : RAW6960×4640, MP46912×4608, MP4 Proxy1920×1280; : RAW6960×3672, 4K DCI4096×2160, 4K UHD3840×2160, 2K DCI2048×1080, FHD1920×1080 : NTSC: 179.8P/119.9P/59.94P/29.97P/24P/23.98P; PAL: 150P/100P/50P/25P/24P vs 7K) · Body weight (609 g vs 598 g).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 4 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.