HKC MG27H11QS vs HKC MG27Q
The short answer
HKC MG27Q wins this comparison with a score of 58/100, ahead of HKC MG27H11QS (57).
The main differences: Max refresh rate (180 Hz vs 165 Hz) · Panel type (Fast-IPS vs Nano-IPS).
Scores are computed from 3 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| HKC MG27H11QS | HKC MG27Q | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 38 | 39 |
How to choose
Pick the HKC MG27H11QS if you care about…
- Max refresh rate 180 Hz +15 Hz vs 165 Hz
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
BENQ EW3270U
SAMSUNG Odyssey G7 32
SAMSUNG Odyssey G5 27
Where they differ
2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| HKC MG27H11QS | HKC MG27Q | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max refresh rate | 180 Hz | 165 Hz | HKC MG27H11QS |
| Panel type | Fast-IPS | Nano-IPS | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display3▾
| HKC MG27H11QS | HKC MG27Q | |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2560x1440 | 2560x1440 |
| Max refresh rate | 180 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | Fast-IPS | Nano-IPS |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, HKC MG27H11QS or HKC MG27Q?
HKC MG27Q edges ahead 58 to 57. Choose HKC MG27H11QS instead if Max refresh rate matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Max refresh rate (180 Hz vs 165 Hz) · Panel type (Fast-IPS vs Nano-IPS).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 3 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.