Honor MagicPad4 vs Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra
Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra — Pick the Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra — it leads these groups: Display 2
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra wins this comparison with a score of 64/100, ahead of Honor MagicPad4 (63).
The main differences: Screen size (12.3 in vs 8.8 in) · Peak brightness (2400 nits vs 4500 nits) · Pixel density (290 ppi vs 309 ppi).
Scores are computed from 14 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Honor MagicPad4 | Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 67 | 67 |
| Battery | 58 | 50 |
| Performance | 83 | 83 |
| Camera | 20 | 19 |
| Design | 80 | 94 |
How to choose
Pick the Honor MagicPad4 if you care about…
- Screen size 12.3 in +3.5 in vs 8.8 in
- Battery capacity 10100 mAh +1080 mAh vs 9020 mAh
- Selfie camera 9 MP +1 MP vs 8 MP
- Thickness 4.8 mm +0.9 mm vs 5.7 mm
Pick the Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra if you care about…
- Peak brightness 4500 nits +2100 nits vs 2400 nits
- Pixel density 309 ppi +19 ppi vs 290 ppi
- Weight 298 g +152 g vs 450 g
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Lenovo Tab Plus
Where they differ
9 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Honor MagicPad4 | Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 12.3 in | 8.8 in | Honor MagicPad4 |
| Peak brightness | 2400 nits | 4500 nits | Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra |
| Pixel density | 290 ppi | 309 ppi | Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra |
| Battery capacity | 10100 mAh | 9020 mAh | Honor MagicPad4 |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | Depends |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 | Depends |
| Selfie camera | 9 MP | 8 MP | Honor MagicPad4 |
| Weight | 450 g | 298 g | Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra |
| Thickness | 4.8 mm | 5.7 mm | Honor MagicPad4 |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display4▾
| Honor MagicPad4 | Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 12.3 in | 8.8 in |
| Peak brightness | 2400 nits | 4500 nits |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Pixel density | 290 ppi | 309 ppi |
Battery2▾
| Honor MagicPad4 | Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 10100 mAh | 9020 mAh |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 66 W |
Performance4▾
| Honor MagicPad4 | Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 |
Camera2▾
| Honor MagicPad4 | Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Selfie camera | 9 MP | 8 MP |
Design2▾
| Honor MagicPad4 | Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 450 g | 298 g |
| Thickness | 4.8 mm | 5.7 mm |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Honor MagicPad4 or Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra?
Vivo vivo iQOO Pad Ultra edges ahead 64 to 63 and leads in Display. Choose Honor MagicPad4 instead if Screen size matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (12.3 in vs 8.8 in) · Peak brightness (2400 nits vs 4500 nits) · Pixel density (290 ppi vs 309 ppi).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 14 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.