Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra vs iQOO Neo9S Pro+
Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra — Pick the Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra — it leads these groups: Display 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra wins this comparison with a score of 46/100, ahead of iQOO Neo9S Pro+ (36).
The main differences: Display type (AMOLED（维信诺VM9） vs AMOLED（8T LTPO）) · Battery capacity (9100 mAh vs 5500 mAh) · Wired charging (100 W vs 120 W).
Scores are computed from 25 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra if you care about…
- Screen size 6.8 in +0.0 in vs 6.8 in
- Battery capacity 9100 mAh +3600 mAh vs 5500 mAh
- Length 163.4 mm +0.1 mm vs 163.5 mm
Pick the iQOO Neo9S Pro+ if you care about…
- Wired charging 120 W +20 W vs 100 W
- Weight 198 g +27 g vs 225 g
- Thickness 8.0 mm +0.6 mm vs 8.6 mm
- Width 75.7 mm +0.2 mm vs 75.9 mm
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
OnePlus 13
OnePlus 15
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Where they differ
10 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra | iQOO Neo9S Pro+ | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | AMOLED（维信诺VM9） | AMOLED（8T LTPO） | Depends |
| Battery capacity | 9100 mAh | 5500 mAh | Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 120 W | iQOO Neo9S Pro+ |
| OS | OriginOS 6 | OriginOS 4 | Depends |
| Weight | 225 g | 198 g | iQOO Neo9S Pro+ |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.0 mm | iQOO Neo9S Pro+ |
| Length | 163.4 mm | 163.5 mm | Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 75.7 mm | iQOO Neo9S Pro+ |
| Colors | 乘风，驰光白，疾影黑 查看外观 | Buff蓝，星曜白，格斗黑 查看外观 | Depends |
| Body material | 中框材质：铝合金 后盖材质：疾影黑：玻纤；驰光白、乘风：玻璃 查看外观图 | 中框材质 塑胶 后盖材质 格斗黑、星曜白：玻璃；Buff蓝：素皮 查看外观图 | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra | iQOO Neo9S Pro+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.8 in | 6.8 in |
| Peak brightness | 4500 nits | — |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Pixel density | 514 ppi | — |
| Display type | AMOLED（维信诺VM9） | AMOLED（8T LTPO） |
Battery3▾
| Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra | iQOO Neo9S Pro+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 9100 mAh | 5500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 120 W |
| Wireless charging | — | — |
Performance4▾
| Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra | iQOO Neo9S Pro+ | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 12 GB | — |
| Chipset | Dimensity 9500M | — |
| OS | OriginOS 6 | OriginOS 4 |
| Storage | 256 GB | — |
Camera2▾
| Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra | iQOO Neo9S Pro+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | — |
Design7▾
| Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra | iQOO Neo9S Pro+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 225 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.0 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | ✓ | — |
| Length | 163.4 mm | 163.5 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 75.7 mm |
| Colors | 乘风，驰光白，疾影黑 查看外观 | Buff蓝，星曜白，格斗黑 查看外观 |
| Body material | 中框材质：铝合金 后盖材质：疾影黑：玻纤；驰光白、乘风：玻璃 查看外观图 | 中框材质 塑胶 后盖材质 格斗黑、星曜白：玻璃；Buff蓝：素皮 查看外观图 |
Memory1▾
| Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra | iQOO Neo9S Pro+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | — | — |
Platform1▾
| Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra | iQOO Neo9S Pro+ | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
Features2▾
| Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra | iQOO Neo9S Pro+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | — |
FAQ
Which is better, Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra or iQOO Neo9S Pro+?
Vivo vivo iQOO Neo11 Ultra has the higher overall score (46 vs 36) and leads in Display. Choose iQOO Neo9S Pro+ instead if Wired charging matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Display type (AMOLED（维信诺VM9） vs AMOLED（8T LTPO）) · Battery capacity (9100 mAh vs 5500 mAh) · Wired charging (100 W vs 120 W).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 25 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.