XG2 7ACS vs Samsung C24F390FHC
The short answer
XG2 7ACS wins this comparison with a score of 57.3/100, ahead of Samsung C24F390FHC (56.8).
The main differences: Resolution (2560x1440 vs 1920x1080) · Panel type (Fast-IPS vs VA) · Weight (with stand) (3930 g vs 3300 g).
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| XG2 7ACS | Samsung C24F390FHC | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 38 | 36 |
| Ergonomics | 89 | 89 |
How to choose
Pick the Samsung C24F390FHC if you care about…
- Weight (with stand) 3300 g +630 g vs 3930 g
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
BENQ EW3270U
SAMSUNG Odyssey G7 32
SAMSUNG Odyssey G5 27
Where they differ
3 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| XG2 7ACS | Samsung C24F390FHC | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2560x1440 | 1920x1080 | Depends |
| Panel type | Fast-IPS | VA | Depends |
| Weight (with stand) | 3930 g | 3300 g | Samsung C24F390FHC |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display4▾
| XG2 7ACS | Samsung C24F390FHC | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | — | 23.5 in |
| Resolution | 2560x1440 | 1920x1080 |
| Max refresh rate | 180 Hz | — |
| Panel type | Fast-IPS | VA |
Ergonomics1▾
| XG2 7ACS | Samsung C24F390FHC | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | 3930 g | 3300 g |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, XG2 7ACS or Samsung C24F390FHC?
XG2 7ACS edges ahead 57 to 57. Choose Samsung C24F390FHC instead if Weight (with stand) matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Resolution (2560x1440 vs 1920x1080) · Panel type (Fast-IPS vs VA) · Weight (with stand) (3930 g vs 3300 g).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.