Haier KJ318F-A180A vs Philips KJ330F-C03 AC4076
The short answer
Philips KJ330F-C03 AC4076 wins this comparison with a score of 75/100, ahead of Haier KJ318F-A180A (47).
Scores are computed from 2 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Haier KJ318F-A180A | Philips KJ330F-C03 AC4076 | |
|---|---|---|
| Noise | 7 | 57 |
| Efficiency | 96 | 98 |
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Xiaomi Xiaomi Air Purifier4Pro
Xiaomi Xiaomi Air Purifier5S
IQAir Atem X
airpal VB110 V-B110
KJ100G-A01 KJ100G-A01
LEXY AP33
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Noise1▾
| Haier KJ318F-A180A | Philips KJ330F-C03 AC4076 | |
|---|---|---|
| Noise level | 66 dB | — |
Efficiency1▾
| Haier KJ318F-A180A | Philips KJ330F-C03 AC4076 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 75 W | — |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Haier KJ318F-A180A or Philips KJ330F-C03 AC4076?
Philips KJ330F-C03 AC4076 has the higher overall score (75 vs 47).
What are the main differences?
Scores are computed from 2 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 2 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.