Philips 325M8C vs PHILIPS E Line 276E8VJSB
Philips 325M8C — Pick the Philips 325M8C — it leads these groups: Display 2
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Philips 325M8C wins this comparison with a score of 62/100, ahead of PHILIPS E Line 276E8VJSB (54).
The main differences: Screen size (31.5 in vs 27 in) · Resolution (2560x1440 vs 3840 x 2160 pixels) · Max refresh rate (144 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Scores are computed from 13 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Philips 325M8C | PHILIPS E Line 276E8VJSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 44 | 39 |
| Connectivity | 32 | 39 |
| Ergonomics | 84 | 48 |
How to choose
Pick the Philips 325M8C if you care about…
- Screen size 31.5 in +4.5 in vs 27 in
- Max refresh rate 144 Hz +84 Hz vs 60 Hz
Pick the PHILIPS E Line 276E8VJSB if you care about…
- Weight (with stand) 4840 g +1770 g vs 6610 g
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
MSI Optix MAG274QRF
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
LG UltraFine 27UL500
BENQ EW3270U
Where they differ
5 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Philips 325M8C | PHILIPS E Line 276E8VJSB | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 31.5 in | 27 in | Philips 325M8C |
| Resolution | 2560x1440 | 3840 x 2160 pixels | Depends |
| Max refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz | Philips 325M8C |
| Panel type | VA | IPS | Depends |
| Weight (with stand) | 6610 g | 4840 g | PHILIPS E Line 276E8VJSB |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display7▾
| Philips 325M8C | PHILIPS E Line 276E8VJSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 31.5 in | 27 in |
| Resolution | 2560x1440 | 3840 x 2160 pixels |
| Max refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Response time | — | 5 ms |
| Brightness | — | 350 cd/m² |
| Panel type | VA | IPS |
| sRGB coverage | — | 109 % |
Connectivity3▾
| Philips 325M8C | PHILIPS E Line 276E8VJSB | |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | — | 2 |
| DisplayPort ports | — | 1 |
| Built-in speakers | — | — |
Ergonomics3▾
| Philips 325M8C | PHILIPS E Line 276E8VJSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Height adjustment | — | — |
| Weight (with stand) | 6610 g | 4840 g |
| Energy per 1000 h | — | 31 kWh |
Data sources: GSMArena · Icecat
FAQ
Which is better, Philips 325M8C or PHILIPS E Line 276E8VJSB?
Philips 325M8C has the higher overall score (62 vs 54) and leads in Display. Choose PHILIPS E Line 276E8VJSB instead if Weight (with stand) matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (31.5 in vs 27 in) · Resolution (2560x1440 vs 3840 x 2160 pixels) · Max refresh rate (144 Hz vs 60 Hz).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 13 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.