EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

Archer Be3600 Pro vs Archer Be400

🏆 Settled

Archer Be400 — Pick the Archer Be400 — it leads these groups: Hardware 1

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

Archer Be400 wins this comparison with a score of 50.3/100, ahead of Archer Be3600 Pro (50.0).

The main differences: Wi-Fi speed (3600 Mb/s vs 2500 Mb/s) · External antennas (4 vs 6).

Scores are computed from 3 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

Archer Be3600 Pro

Archer Be3600 Pro

TP-Link
50score / 100
1 win · 2 tied
🏆 Overall winner Archer Be400

Archer Be400

TP-Link
50score / 100
1 win · 2 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Archer Be3600 ProArcher Be400
Wireless 5 3
Hardware 19 24
Ports 63 63

How to choose

Pick the Archer Be3600 Pro if you care about…

  • Wi-Fi speed 3600 Mb/s +1100 Mb/s vs 2500 Mb/s

Pick the Archer Be400 if you care about…

  • External antennas 6 +2 vs 4

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

Archer Be3600 ProArcher Be400Where they differ
Wi-Fi speed 3600 Mb/s2500 Mb/s Archer Be3600 Pro
External antennas 46 Archer Be400

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Wireless1▾
Archer Be3600 ProArcher Be400
Wi-Fi speed 3600 Mb/s 2500 Mb/s
Hardware1▾
Archer Be3600 ProArcher Be400
External antennas 4 6
Ports1▾
Archer Be3600 ProArcher Be400
LAN ports 5 5

Data sources: Amazon

FAQ

Which is better, Archer Be3600 Pro or Archer Be400?

Archer Be400 edges ahead 50 to 50 and leads in Hardware. Choose Archer Be3600 Pro instead if Wi-Fi speed matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Wi-Fi speed (3600 Mb/s vs 2500 Mb/s) · External antennas (4 vs 6).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 3 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.